ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance?
Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-10
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Batch closing of TCS issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-10)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call - UPDATE (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-14)
- Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from singer@mac.com on 2014-05-13)
- Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-12)
- Agenda for May 7 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-06)
- Re: Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-04-28)
- Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-04-28)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
- Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: ISSUE-132: compliance or tpe? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-11-09)
- ISSUE-132: compliance or tpe? (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-09)
- RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
- Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
- ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-10)
Related notes:
[ifette]: I would suggest that "an intermediary must not add or change any signal that will result in a server receiving an inconsistent DNT state when looking at the DNT value expressed in the header vs the DNT value expressed via the JavaScript API"
4 Oct 2012, 10:23:26My text suggestion: "If a communication includes a DNT signal, do not modify or remove it."
Thomas Lowenthal, 4 Oct 2012, 10:29:32Noted during issue cleanup, this may be a sub-issue of issue-194 around user consent.
Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 02:16:34Closed per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2014Sep/0023.html
Justin Brookman, 25 Feb 2015, 03:47:23Display change log