ISSUE-46: Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?"
revisit-rdf-equivalent-uri's
Revisit "Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?"
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Cleanup tasks
- Raised by:
- David Wood
- Opened on:
- 2011-05-03
- Description:
- See http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
rdf-equivalent-uri's: Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two
uri's to be equivalent?
RESOLVE: Closed, owl provides owl:sameAs already.
Pierre-Antoine wishes to continue discussion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Apr/0339.html
NB: The Charter allows us to "Update and extend the RDF Primer. New features may include multi-syntax examples, more up-to-date in terms of the vocabularies used, may deal with issues around Linked Data like the use of “owl:sameAsâ€, the “follow-your-nose†algorithm, etc." - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Reviewing open DCAT actions; action required from Bernadette, Phil, John, Sandro (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-01-31)
- Reviewing open DCAT actions; action required from Bernadette, Phil, John, Sandro (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2013-01-31)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit 'Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?' [Cleanup tasks] (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2011-05-03)
- RDF-ISSUE-46 (revisit-rdfms-quoting): Revisit 'Should RDF have a mechanism for declaring two uri's to be equivalent?' [Cleanup tasks] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-05-03)
Related notes:
RESOLVED to close with no action because owl:sameAs is already widely used and accepted.
David Wood, 13 Oct 2011, 17:17:46Display change log