ISSUE-260: In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions.
TLebo
In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions.
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-22
- Description:
- Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance.
:prov_1 {
:simon a prov:Human;
prov:hasAnnotation [
a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent";
rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead.";
];
}
:prov_2 {
:simon ex3:reputation "excellent" .
}
:prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter .
:prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent.
Thanks,
Tim
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-09-04)
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-15)
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-14)
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
- Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-05-17)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-05-16)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-16)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-16)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-16)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-15)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-15)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-15)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-05-15)
- RE: provenance of provenance (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-05-14)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-12)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de on 2012-05-12)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from reza.bfar@oracle.com on 2012-05-11)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-11)
- Re: provenance of provenance (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-11)
- provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-10)
- Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-29)
- Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-28)
- Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-25)
- Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-22)
- PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-22)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log