ISSUE-224: Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs?
unified-prov-namespace
Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Luc Moreau
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-19
- Description:
- To promote interoperability, can we provide a single namespace for PROV specifications?
Issue assigned to PROV-DM, but applicable to all data model mappings. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
- Re: Namespace for prov specs (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Namespace for prov specs (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Namespace for prov specs (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-22)
- Re: Namespace for prov specs (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-21)
- Namespace for prov specs (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-19)
- [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-29)
- [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-29)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-24)
- PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-19)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log