See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0037
approve publication on next weeks call
Shadi: approve publication on next weeks call
... very urgent
... review specs until next week
... basically review the changes
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline
Shadi: discuss open issues today
... changes to the specs where mostly minor, mostly editorial changes
... EARL guide with substantial changes
... Conformance section moved from the specs
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note1
Shadi: suggestions: keep editor note and wait for
feedback or remove it
... keep it or remove it?
... anybody objects?
Kostas: wonder why do we need foaf:Document?
CarlosV: equivalent to cnt:Content, so better remove it
Shadi: leave it for this publication so we can
still discuss it?
... change editor's note to "ERT WG plans to remove foaf:Document....."
... foaf:Document is widely used
... would like see more arguments for removing it
... what if you have your library already using foaf:Document? then you have
to rewrite it, if we remove it
... suggestion to discuss this later
Kostas: ok
<shadi> ACTION: shadi to change editor note 1 in EARL 1.0 Schema to say "ERT is considering removing foaf:Document" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-121 - Change editor note 1 in EARL 1.0 Schema to say "ERT is considering removing foaf:Document" [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note2
Shadi: continue with this approach?
Kostas: think, it is nice to have it.
Shadi: keep editor note?
CarlosV: would remove it
Shadi: objections for removing it?
<shadi> ACTION: shadi to remove editor note 2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-122 - Remove editor note 2 [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note3
Shadi: objection: reusing DOAP vs. DOAP is to
broad for our use
... publish with open issue? objections?
... Software as subclass of doap:Project?
CarlosV: would prefer not to subclass
Carlos: same position, not using DOAP
... but would not object if somebody find it useful
Shadi: I think it would be a compromise to
subclass daop:Project
... Keep editor's note
... No response until now from Edd Dumbill
... Any comments? Any objections?
RESOLUTION: Make Software a subclass of doap:Project and keep editor's note
Shadi: Any other comments?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/#introduction
Shadi: potential conflict HTTP in RDF 1.0 and
HTTP 1.1
... Any other comments on this document?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/#ContentClass
Shadi: Change dct:source to dct:hasFormat and
dct:isFormatOf
... editor's note outdated. Should we still ask for feedback?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/issues#ContentClass
Shadi: For example text from a server could be
recorded in different ways. dct:hasFormat and dct:isFormatOf could relate those
instances.
... suggestion to keep the editor's note and also ask for comments on the use
of dct:hasFormat and dct:isFormatOf
CarlosV: do we have the latest version of the RDF files on the web?
<shadi> ACTION: carlosv to update editor note in content-in-rdf but keep it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-123 - Update editor note in content-in-rdf but keep it [on Carlos A. Velasco - due 2011-05-04].
<shadi> ACTION: shadi to check with carlosV and philip on the latest versions of content-in-rdf drafts [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - Check with carlosV and philip on the latest versions of content-in-rdf drafts [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].
Shadi: Any other comments on this document?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers-in-RDF/#namespaceMappingClass
Shadi: Keep that note?
Carlos: It was there for a long time, so I would remove it now. There is not much feedback.
Shadi: anybody objects?
<shadi> ACTION: carlosI to remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - carlosI
Shadi: Any other comments on this document?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20110427#toc
Shadi: section two is from the current document,
section three the conformance sections of the current specs, section four
discussed later
... priority to import conformance sections
... Any other comments on this document?
Shadi: Please review the documents this week.
Beginning next week discussion on mailing list. Approve on next meeting.
... Any other comments?
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline#meeting
<carlos> ACTION: ciglesia to remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-125 - Remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2011-05-04].