15:40:01 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:40:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-irc 15:40:03 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:40:03 Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf 15:40:05 Zakim, this will be 7322733 15:40:05 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 20 minutes 15:40:06 Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference 15:40:06 Date: 12 April 2011 15:45:37 ok 15:45:39 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Apr/0009.html 15:45:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:45:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:45:53 And I have already scribed today at another meeting... 15:46:01 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:46:27 regrets+ Boris 15:46:32 regrets+ Richard 15:46:40 alexdeleon has joined #RDB2RDF 15:46:59 regrets+ Marcelo 15:47:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:47:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:47:31 Chair: Michael 15:48:38 ericP? 15:48:57 juansequeda has joined #rdb2rdf 15:51:55 juansequeda, in case ericP can't scribe, would you be able to? 15:52:24 I was expecting you to ask me that :) 15:52:33 I guess I haven't scribed in a while 15:53:40 scribenick: juansequeda 15:54:18 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:54:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:54:21 ok 15:55:10 regrets+ Ashok 15:56:32 Topic: Admin 15:56:52 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:56:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:57:26 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:57:34 + +49.112.8.aaaa 15:57:53 +mhausenblas 15:58:15 +juansequeda 15:58:51 Zakim, aaaa is alexdeleon 15:58:51 +alexdeleon; got it 15:58:58 Zakim, mute alexdeleon 15:58:58 alexdeleon should now be muted 15:59:00 zakim, dial ivan-voip 15:59:00 ok, ivan; the call is being made 15:59:02 +Ivan 15:59:08 Zakim, unmute alexdeleon 15:59:08 alexdeleon should no longer be muted 15:59:13 Zakim, mute me 15:59:13 mhausenblas should now be muted 15:59:20 Zakim, unmute me 15:59:20 mhausenblas should no longer be muted 15:59:38 Zakim, who's here? 15:59:38 On the phone I see alexdeleon, mhausenblas, juansequeda, Ivan 15:59:39 On IRC I see juansequeda, alexdeleon, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas, ivan, MacTed, iv_an_ru_, betehess, LeeF, trackbot, ericP 16:00:12 +dmcneil 16:00:14 Zakim, mute alexdeleon 16:00:14 alexdeleon should now be muted 16:00:39 dmcneil has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:53 soeren has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:54 do you still have the problem? 16:01:02 no 16:01:35 Zakim, who's here? 16:01:35 On the phone I see alexdeleon (muted), mhausenblas, juansequeda, Ivan, dmcneil 16:01:38 On IRC I see soeren, dmcneil, juansequeda, alexdeleon, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas, ivan, MacTed, iv_an_ru_, betehess, LeeF, trackbot, ericP 16:01:51 +[IPcaller] 16:01:52 Zakim, unmute alexdeleon 16:01:52 alexdeleon should no longer be muted 16:02:05 zakim, +[IPcaller] is soeren 16:02:05 sorry, soeren, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 16:02:05 Zakim, IPcaller is soeren 16:02:06 +soeren; got it 16:02:09 nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF 16:02:15 Zakim, nunolopes is with me 16:02:15 +nunolopes; got it 16:02:34 PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/03/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:02:40 Souri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:02:43 +1 16:02:46 +Souri_ 16:04:14 RESOLUTION: the minutes from last meeting have been accepted 16:04:16 zakim, who is making noise? 16:04:26 Souri, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 7 (29%), juansequeda (9%), Ivan (39%) 16:04:30 Topic: Towards REC 16:04:39 privera has joined #RDB2RDF 16:04:48 +??P2 16:04:50 007 => James Bond 16:05:08 Zakim, ??P2 is privera 16:05:08 +privera; got it 16:05:14 zakim, who is here? 16:05:14 On the phone I see alexdeleon, mhausenblas, juansequeda, Ivan, dmcneil, soeren, Souri_, privera 16:05:20 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:05:22 On IRC I see privera, Souri, nunolopes, soeren, dmcneil, juansequeda, alexdeleon, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas, ivan, MacTed, iv_an_ru_, betehess, LeeF, trackbot, ericP 16:05:24 Seema has joined #rdb2rdf 16:05:31 Zakim, mute me 16:05:31 privera should now be muted 16:05:59 +Seema 16:06:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr 16:06:29 mhausenblas: Ivan will describe what the next steps are for formal requirements 16:06:38 ... based on http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr 16:06:45 ... which captures all the W3C process 16:07:04 ivan: we have had several drafts which is fine 16:07:12 ... and it is up to us to decide how many of those to publish 16:07:22 ... we have to come to a Last Call Working Draft 16:07:34 ... and this means that the WG thinks that it has solved all the technical issues 16:07:40 Michael: LC see http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#last-call 16:07:52 ... there shouldn't be any open issues 16:07:58 ... and we should get their soon 16:08:15 ... the Last Call Working Draft should lead to comments from the community 16:08:28 ... and if we are lucky, we won't get any comments 16:08:42 ... if we do get comments, then we have to reissue a new Last Call Working Draft 16:09:00 ... if we are lucky/we did a good job, the community should be happy with the Last Call Working Draft 16:09:24 ... we have to tell the community that they have 6 weeks.. 2 months to give comments back 16:09:37 ... and we need to document how we address the community comments 16:10:12 ... after the Last Call Working Draft comes the Candidate Recommendation 16:10:21 ... this is to prove that the technology can be implemented 16:10:21 Zakim, please dial ericP-office 16:10:21 ok, ericP; the call is being made 16:10:22 Zakim, mute juansequeda 16:10:23 juansequeda should now be muted 16:10:23 +EricP 16:10:32 ... during this phase, we call for implementations 16:10:41 ... we expect 2 mutually independent implementations 16:11:06 ... we need to produce a load of test cases 16:11:09 Zakim, who's here? 16:11:09 On the phone I see alexdeleon, mhausenblas, juansequeda (muted), Ivan, dmcneil, soeren, Souri_, privera (muted), Seema, EricP 16:11:11 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:11:12 On IRC I see Seema, privera, Souri, nunolopes, soeren, dmcneil, juansequeda, alexdeleon, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas, ivan, MacTed, iv_an_ru_, betehess, LeeF, trackbot, ericP 16:11:16 ... we hope to have several implementations 16:11:18 q? 16:11:32 ... we need a way to document. implementation x has features a,b,c 16:12:08 ... revelytix has an implementation of R2RML, alex/eric has a direct mapping, juan has a direct mapping 16:12:14 ... we need another R2RML implementation 16:12:27 ... the candidate recommendation phase can show two options 16:12:38 ... 1) one of the features is almost impossible to implement 16:12:52 ... and if this is the case, then we have to go back to Working Draft 16:13:02 ... 2) we did a good a job and no problems should arise 16:13:13 q+ to note on handling issues/formal objection 16:13:19 ... after Candidate Recommendation, we go to Proposed Recommendation 16:13:36 ... and the the AC members of the W3C will vote on this document in order for it to become a recommendation 16:13:46 ... and that is the process 16:14:18 q? 16:14:20 ... There is a lot of admin stuff that needs to be done (documenting what we did, how we addressed the community comments, etc) 16:15:39 mhausenblas: we need to document all the comments even if they are contradict eachother 16:15:46 ... what happens if there is a formal objection? 16:16:02 ack me 16:16:02 mhausenblas, you wanted to note on handling issues/formal objection 16:16:15 ivan: we need to avoid formal objections 16:16:28 ... and we need to find a consensus 16:16:44 ... and that is why it takes so long to come up with a standard 16:17:02 +OpenLink_Software 16:17:14 ... there are cases where we don't come to a consensus on a formal objection 16:17:16 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:17:16 +MacTed; got it 16:17:50 ... and if so, it goes up to the director (timbl), and it is his decision 16:17:58 ... however, we have never had a case like this 16:18:21 ericP 16:18:21 ; 16:18:41 ericP: we need to show which issues came from outside 16:19:57 ivan: ... (talking about how rdfa and owl WG have organized themselves in order to address community comments) 16:20:35 mhausenblas: souri, are you guys planning to implement this? 16:20:51 q+ 16:21:01 souri: we are planning to implement R2RML and this will coincide with a new release of oracle 16:21:31 ivan: in the candidate recommendation phase, the implementation should be product quality 16:21:41 souri:... beta release is a limited release 16:21:52 ivan: this is fine for a candidate recommendation phase 16:22:06 q? 16:22:14 ... if you state that you have implemented x amount of features, that is fine 16:22:44 q+ 16:22:46 souri: we already had an implementation of the direct mapping, even before the spec came out 16:23:01 ack ivan 16:23:03 ack ericP 16:23:22 ericP: does your direct mapping produce an RDF graph or can you only query it with SPARQL 16:23:36 souri: you can query it with SPARQL 16:23:47 +Alexandre 16:24:02 ... we get a SPARQL query and translate to a SQL query 16:24:10 ericP: can you then do ASK? 16:24:14 souri: yes 16:25:21 ivan: in the OWL group, Oracle appears in the candidate recommendation phase, and this was before the official release of oracle 16:25:35 souri: yes, this was implemented before 16:25:58 mhausenblas: we need to organize the timeframe now 16:26:22 zakim, drop me 16:26:22 Ivan is being disconnected 16:26:22 -Ivan 16:26:31 zakim, dial ivan-voip 16:26:31 ok, ivan; the call is being made 16:26:33 +Ivan 16:26:58 mhausenblas: same question to Openlink 16:27:04 MacTed: I have no information on dates 16:27:14 mhausenblas: could you figure it out? 16:27:17 MacTed: ok 16:27:33 mhausenblas: david, any critical dates? 16:28:01 dmcneil: we do not have plans to make a direct mapping implementation 16:29:06 soeren: working on something. but we don't have concrete dates. 16:29:11 q+ 16:29:20 zakim, unmute me 16:29:20 juansequeda should no longer be muted 16:29:28 ack juansequeda 16:29:56 juansequeda: we will have an implementation of direct mapping ready for June 16:30:04 q+ 16:30:11 ack betehess 16:30:29 betehess: eric/alex will be presenting at K-CAP 16:30:50 http://kcap11.stanford.edu/ 16:33:13 juansequeda: marcelo will be giving a tutorial at SIGMOD/PODS and juan will be at the semantic web summer school talking about rdb2rdf 16:33:23 would be good to have something close to LC (at least very stable) because of all the conferences 16:33:31 mhausenblas: we need more exposure in the industry side 16:33:47 q+ 16:33:52 q+ 16:34:07 q+ to speak about exposure in industry 16:34:15 Zakim, mute juansequeda 16:34:15 juansequeda should now be muted 16:34:29 souri: we will be doing something at Oracle Open World 16:34:51 ack ericP 16:35:07 ericP: i was at Enterprise Data world and I talked about it on a panel that I was at 16:35:23 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDB2RDF_Publicity 16:35:24 iv_an_ru_ has joined #rdb2rdf 16:35:56 ack betehess 16:35:56 betehess, you wanted to speak about exposure in industry 16:35:57 q? 16:36:29 q+ 16:37:06 ack ivan 16:37:31 ivan: to make clear, for the candidate recommendation phase, there is no requirement, that the implementation has to come from the working group 16:37:47 q+ to say "in fact, it's even better if the impls come from outside" 16:37:57 ... if there is any organization outside.. even better 16:38:04 q- 16:38:21 q? 16:38:42 q+ 16:39:29 ack betehess 16:39:47 betehess: what are the concrete next steps in order to get to the Last Call 16:39:57 ivan: we still have open issues. these need to be closed 16:40:05 Topic: Test Harness 16:40:22 zakim, mute me 16:40:22 Ivan should now be muted 16:40:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestHarness 16:40:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestHarness 16:40:45 alexdeleon: here we have 3 proposals, which I think the third one is the most adequate 16:41:06 ... we need to publish the test cases in a machine consumable way 16:41:25 .. each test has its own URI which is resolvable 16:41:30 q+ on manifest 16:41:59 ... maybe optional report run time 16:42:19 ... these are for materialized RDF 16:42:19 Michael: the test cases manifest is in fact http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ - in RDFa ;) 16:42:25 q+ to ask if we should introduce a dependency from the Test Harness to both Direct Mapping and R2RML? (/me would say yes) 16:42:34 ... for SPARQL to SQL implementations, the testing is a bit more complicated 16:43:05 q? 16:43:19 http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ 16:43:35 mhausenblas: the current test-cases are in RDFa 16:44:37 sorry.. I'm a bit lost on scribing. 16:44:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ 16:44:53 mhausenblas and alexdeleon talking about machine consumable test cases 16:45:40 alexdeleon: for posting the results of the test? 16:46:55 http://sparql.org/sparql.html 16:47:37 q? 16:47:44 ack me 16:47:44 mhausenblas, you wanted to comment on manifest 16:48:44 +1 16:48:53 ericP: we need to test for exact graph match. 16:49:03 ... we can make a CONSTRUCT query 16:49:13 ... and this will give you a sparql report which is the full RDF graph 16:49:24 ... and then you can compare two graphs 16:49:31 actually, exact graph match as graph isomorphism 16:50:31 zakim, unmute me 16:50:31 juansequeda should no longer be muted 16:51:01 q? 16:51:17 ericP: we are dealing with small graphs 16:51:17 ack betehess 16:51:17 betehess, you wanted to ask if we should introduce a dependency from the Test Harness to both Direct Mapping and R2RML? (/me would say yes) 16:51:55 betehess: should both direct mapping and R2RML document reference the Test Harness 16:52:12 ... we should publish three documents at once 16:52:18 ... and reference the Test Harness 16:52:36 Michael: not the Test Harness, but the Test Cases http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ 16:53:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/r2 16:53:30 the OWL WG just had a test cases on a separate wiki site, actually... 16:53:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html 16:54:08 betehess: we don't really care about versioning for the test suite 16:54:27 s/test suite/test suite?/ 16:54:43 ericP: things were volatile for a while, and then we froze it 16:55:16 mhausenblas: anything else on this topic 16:55:52 bye guys 16:55:58 zakim, drop me 16:55:58 Ivan is being disconnected 16:55:59 -Ivan 16:56:26 -dmcneil 16:56:27 -Souri_ 16:56:27 -Alexandre 16:56:29 -MacTed 16:56:30 -Seema 16:56:33 Zakim, drop me 16:56:33 privera is being disconnected 16:56:34 [meeting adjourned] 16:56:34 -privera 16:56:37 -juansequeda 16:56:38 -soeren 16:56:38 -mhausenblas 16:56:39 -alexdeleon 16:56:39 -EricP 16:56:41 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended 16:56:43 Attendees were +49.112.8.aaaa, mhausenblas, juansequeda, alexdeleon, Ivan, dmcneil, soeren, nunolopes, Souri_, privera, Seema, EricP, MacTed, Alexandre 16:57:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:57:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:57:07 privera has left #RDB2RDF 17:01:36 trackbot, end telecon 17:01:36 Zakim, list attendees 17:01:36 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 17:01:37 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:01:37 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html trackbot 17:01:38 RRSAgent, bye 17:01:38 I see no action items