See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 29 March 2011
<scribe> chair: Michael
<scribe> meeting: RDB2RDF
<mhausenblas> scribenick: Ashok
<mhausenblas> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0137.html
<ericP> (meeting with validator folks)
<boris> I also sent regrets
Michael: I did send regrets
<mhausenblas> +1
RESOLUTION: Minutes approved with additional regrets as above
<boris> http://oegdev.dia.fi.upm.es/projects/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDFTestCases.pdf
Test case slides: http://oegdev.dia.fi.upm.es/projects/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDFTestCases.pdf
Boris: Summary of Test Cases and
next steps
... Discusses organization of Test Cases
<dmcneil> +q
Boris: all test cases were accepted
<mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/
Michael: Asks about capturing results of tests
Eric: SPARQL tests use EARL
Michael: Can we use for our tests
<dmcneil> This is a tangent, but are we not supposed to pronounce R2RML as "R-2-RML"?
+1 to David
<ericP> -> EARL Reports for SPARQL http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/earl
<ericP> -> EARL for SPARQL discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0009
Eric: Wants descriptive names for databases
Boris: I will rename testcases
and databases
... We will add testcases based on new discussions
Michael: Asks if we need a test harness that you could run locally
David: +1
<dmcneil> +q
Eric: Asks how folks that implement R2RML as a SPARQL endpoint will implment the test
David: Can we name the tests so they sort properly alphanumerically
Michael: Can you share your testing apparatus?
David: We are having a public demo ... we could contribute to the WG
<Zakim> ericP, you wanted to ask about the SPARQL tests of virtual graphs
David: We could contribute the beta
Eric: How do you test the graph
output of the tests?
... problem with variable predicates
<dmcneil> +q
<boris> I can create a wiki page with initial ideas
Michael: Lets have a look at what David contributes
David: Timeframe?
... and how are tests launched?
<ericP> tests not technically needed before CR, but any testing surprises may send you back to LC
Michael: I would feel better if
we sorted out the test situation earlier
... the more we automate the better bit some flexibility is
needed
... Asks about flexibity of database
<Zakim> ericP, you wanted to say that SPARQL just provided data
Souri: Keep use of SQL simple and use features generally available
Eric: SPARQL just said Here is
the data, here are the results.
... everyone implmented their own
Michael: You are arguing against a standard test harness?
Eric: Let's be flexible
David: Outlines a possible structure for running the tests
Boris: We can discuss
<ericP> SPARQL used tests to exemplify design choices; the Manifest listed the tests needed for the implementation report.
<boris> thanks ericP
<ericP> quite welecome
<mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/raised
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-18?
<trackbot> ISSUE-18 -- Allow SQL queries to be reused in a mapping -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/18
David: Explains issue
<mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: Accept ISSUE-18 and status is OPEN
Souri: We can look at this and create a proposal
RESOLUTION: Issue-18 is opened
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-19?
<trackbot> ISSUE-19 -- Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/19
ISSUE-19
<mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: Accept ISSUE-19 and status is OPEN
David: Explains issue
Souri: We can look at this and create a proposal
RESOLUTION: Issue-19 is opened
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-20?
<trackbot> ISSUE-20 -- Allow a predicate/object map to reference a joined table. -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/20
ISSUE-20
<mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: Set ISSUE-20 to pending review
<scribe> ACTION: David to create usecase for ISSUE-20 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-116 - Create usecase for ISSUE-20 [on David McNeil - due 2011-04-05].
ISSUE-35
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-35?
<trackbot> ISSUE-35 -- Case sensitivity of SQL identifiers -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/35
David: Discusses issue ... interpretation of identifiers should be aligned with database does
RESOLUTION:
ISSUE-20 changed to pending review
... case sensetive or case insensetive
... Issue 35 is opened
<mhausenblas> ISSUE-39?
<trackbot> ISSUE-39 -- Refactor R2RML spec to avoid duplicate definitions -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/39
RESOLUTION: Issue 39 is opened
<mhausenblas> [meeting adjourned]
<mhausenblas> trackbote, end telecon
<mhausenblas> trackbot, end telecon