IRC log of aria on 2010-08-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:01:12 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aria
- 19:01:12 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/17-aria-irc
- 19:01:21 [janina]
- zakim, this will be WAI_PFWG(ARIA
- 19:01:21 [Zakim]
- ok, janina, I see WAI_PFWG(Aria)3:00PM already started
- 19:01:28 [Stevef]
- Stevef has joined #aria
- 19:01:32 [janina]
- zakim, call janina
- 19:01:32 [Zakim]
- ok, janina; the call is being made
- 19:01:34 [Zakim]
- +Janina
- 19:05:40 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 19:06:37 [Stevef]
- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/altspecification
- 19:10:14 [janina]
- scribe: janina
- 19:10:48 [janina]
- sf: We need change proposal review by Rich and Cynthia, then
- 19:11:02 [janina]
- sf: there are a few sections that need completion following a discussion among us.
- 19:12:32 [janina]
- sf: Let's start with updated spec doc -- Made mapping changes from notes and memory -- Are they OK?
- 19:13:10 [janina]
- sf: Tried to include everything that had been cited as ommited.
- 19:13:19 [janina]
- cs: What about merging the tables?
- 19:13:43 [janina]
- sf: First table supposed to semantics not overwritable
- 19:14:36 [Zakim]
- +Rich
- 19:14:57 [richardschwerdtfe]
- richardschwerdtfe has joined #aria
- 19:15:55 [janina]
- cs: Seems if we had one big table, it would meet Maciej's complaint that he couldn't find something.
- 19:16:32 [Stevef]
- http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/misc/HTML5/aria-html5-proposal.html
- 19:16:52 [Stevef]
- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5
- 19:17:26 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aria
- 19:18:48 [janina]
- sf: looking at <aname= -- without an href -- why a restriction?
- 19:19:11 [janina]
- sf: Also added caption. Doesn't seem it should be restricted
- 19:19:46 [janina]
- cs: Text from caption might go into the name, and we should have ARIA on it because someone could make it clickable.
- 19:20:17 [janina]
- sf: put norole for area because it's not rendered
- 19:20:24 [janina]
- cs: area without rhref valid?
- 19:20:25 [janina]
- sf: no
- 19:20:35 [janina]
- cs: what if tabindex?
- 19:20:37 [janina]
- sf: don't know
- 19:21:01 [janina]
- cs: We should treat like span anything without a reason why it shouldn't be overwritten
- 19:21:26 [janina]
- rs: Chaas wants to map area on top of canvas, so why not treat like a div?
- 19:21:43 [janina]
- rs: Is it overwritable?
- 19:21:49 [Stevef]
- If the area element has no href attribute, then the area represented by the element cannot be selected, and the alt attribute must be omitted.
- 19:21:56 [janina]
- sf: No, because not rendered and has no href
- 19:22:19 [janina]
- cs: So how is an area without href conformant?
- 19:22:34 [janina]
- cs: Can live with either way.
- 19:22:52 [janina]
- cs: Prefer default to everything allowed.
- 19:22:54 [janina]
- rs: Agree
- 19:23:08 [janina]
- rs: If applied to canvas, will need aria role
- 19:23:25 [janina]
- sf: OK.
- 19:23:46 [janina]
- sf: Put in "elements without restrictions?"
- 19:23:51 [janina]
- cs: yes
- 19:23:52 [janina]
- rs: yes
- 19:24:16 [janina]
- sf: So do we agree to a single table?
- 19:24:22 [janina]
- cs: Yes, will be easier to read.
- 19:25:17 [janina]
- rs: Yes, as long as it's clear what applies where.
- 19:26:12 [janina]
- sf: Looking now at hgroup ...
- 19:27:04 [janina]
- sf: Overides? Which?
- 19:27:10 [janina]
- cs: Anything. It's a span
- 19:27:19 [janina]
- cs: My default answer, I suspect.
- 19:27:31 [janina]
- sf: But then we need to say why.
- 19:27:46 [janina]
- cs: Unless there's a good reason to limit, don't limit.
- 19:28:12 [janina]
- sf: th element, no column or row header
- 19:29:19 [janina]
- sf: Is it inconsistent with our table guidance?
- 19:29:29 [janina]
- cs: But people repurpose them.
- 19:29:41 [janina]
- sf: difference between changed and additional semantics.
- 19:29:53 [janina]
- sf: This is a clearly defined a11y element to provide info about data tables
- 19:30:06 [janina]
- cs: existed before html had a11y ...
- 19:30:25 [janina]
- sf: But when it's overwritten then you no longer provide a11y info about the table
- 19:30:47 [janina]
- cs: But then what do you do when someone puts a onclick on th--which is common, to sort for instance
- 19:31:39 [janina]
- cs: I could wish aria were additive and not substitutional ...
- 19:33:07 [janina]
- sf: Concerned we shouldn't allow overwrite to turn th into a button, for instance
- 19:33:17 [janina]
- cs: but that's what people do
- 19:35:09 [janina]
- sf: OK, will go with the group consensus, but I can't defend it.
- 19:38:43 [janina]
- sf: So, what can they be overwritten with?
- 19:38:57 [janina]
- rs: We don't prohibit now, right?
- 19:40:42 [janina]
- [Steve not happy with this ...]
- 19:40:56 [janina]
- sf: Most of this has been stable for months ... but now we're saying something different
- 19:41:09 [janina]
- rs: We said we're reviewing the whole thing
- 19:41:14 [janina]
- sf: the parts that are changed
- 19:41:47 [janina]
- cs: Think sf wants help on recent changes ...
- 19:42:35 [janina]
- sf: So what role allowed on table?
- 19:42:41 [janina]
- cs: widgets and presentation, not para
- 19:42:53 [janina]
- sf: But that's what I have!
- 19:43:19 [janina]
- rs: Take from the other direction, what roles should it not support?
- 19:45:26 [janina]
- cs: We need to be consistent in our logic.
- 19:46:41 [janina]
- sf: By that token we should treat href and all struct the same ...
- 19:46:43 [janina]
- rs: yes
- 19:49:59 [janina]
- cs: If we can come up with a rule for these -- It's the one-off's that will get us turned down
- 19:50:32 [Stevef]
- http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ARIAinHTML5
- 19:53:34 [janina]
- sf: So, we're talking about incorrect html use, is it better with aria addition, or not?
- 19:59:03 [janina]
- sf: So, we're talking about incorrect html use, is it better with aria addition, or not?[group going through items]
- 20:02:49 [janina]
- sf: People, please review the entire proposal and provide comments, changes, additions ...
- 20:02:55 [janina]
- cs: Can I send you a word doc?
- 20:02:57 [janina]
- sf: yes
- 20:03:21 [janina]
- sf: We didn't finish, so will need another meeting.
- 20:04:23 [janina]
- sf: Don't know what to do with hgroup ...
- 20:04:33 [janina]
- cs: Heading, and refs inside presentation
- 20:04:39 [janina]
- sf: so now this is new
- 20:05:16 [janina]
- cs: There are two things here, logically it should function like a heading
- 20:05:52 [janina]
- sf: But new elements have a history of being misused, so it could be argued we should support best practice.
- 20:06:19 [janina]
- cs: If aria2 allows us to be additive, we will need to make sure we can add that to HTML5.
- 20:08:01 [janina]
- sf: Cynthia, can provide feedback?
- 20:08:03 [janina]
- cs: yes
- 20:08:09 [janina]
- rs: Yes, but not tonight
- 20:35:53 [Zakim]
- -??P1
- 20:38:24 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 20:41:06 [Zakim]
- -Rich
- 20:41:07 [Zakim]
- -Janina
- 20:41:07 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(Aria)3:00PM has ended
- 20:41:09 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Janina, [Microsoft], Rich
- 20:42:18 [janina]
- zakim, bye
- 20:42:18 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #aria
- 20:42:25 [janina]
- rrsagent make log public
- 20:42:33 [janina]
- rrsagent make minutes
- 20:42:38 [janina]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 20:42:45 [janina]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 20:42:45 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/08/17-aria-minutes.html janina
- 20:42:55 [janina]
- janina has left #aria