19:28:29 RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra 19:28:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-ws-ra-irc 19:28:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:28:31 Zakim has joined #ws-ra 19:28:33 Zakim, this will be WSRA 19:28:33 ok, trackbot, I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM already started 19:28:34 Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference 19:28:34 Date: 15 June 2010 19:28:57 +Bob_Freund 19:29:09 bonjour 19:29:21 Vikas has joined #ws-ra 19:29:22 I am using full dns 19:29:35 ah, no w3c today 19:30:06 + +1.571.262.aaaa 19:30:12 gpilz has joined #ws-ra 19:30:16 571 is loud :-) 19:30:36 wuchou has joined #ws-ra 19:30:44 +[Microsoft] 19:31:07 + +1.831.713.aabb 19:31:08 Ashok has joined #ws-ra 19:31:17 +Wu_Chou 19:31:19 Zakim, aaaa is Vikas 19:31:19 +Vikas; got it 19:31:42 did they really need to stick the "context" into "customized, Compunetics, conferencing system" ? 19:31:50 Ram has joined #ws-ra 19:32:02 +Tom_Rutt 19:32:07 No sympathy from me: http://bronx.ny1.com/content/top_stories/120391/claim--bronx-students-forced-to-clean-school-toilets 19:32:10 Katy has joined #ws-ra 19:32:20 its a punishment! geez. 19:32:45 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0007.html 19:33:21 +Ashok_Malhotra 19:33:27 + +1.800.456.aacc 19:33:49 MartinC has joined #ws-ra 19:33:58 present+ Rick Landau 19:34:03 zakim, aacc is Rick 19:34:03 +Rick; got it 19:34:42 + +3531803aadd 19:35:08 zakim, aadd is Martin 19:35:08 +Martin; got it 19:36:33 scribe: Ashok 19:36:52 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0007.html 19:37:32 scribenick: Ashok 19:37:56 Topic: Agenda\ 19:38:04 Agenda accepted 19:38:21 Topic: Opening 19:38:34 + +44.196.281.aaee 19:38:40 zakim, aaee is Katy 19:38:40 +Katy; got it 19:38:51 Toopic: Minutes from June 8 19:39:03 Approval of minutes of 2010-06-08 19:39:11 Approved w/o objection 19:39:29 Topic: Advance Soap Assertions to Last Call? http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ws-soap-assertions-20100608/ 19:39:42 Bob: Any objections? 19:40:06 No objections. Document will be published as Last Call document 19:40:18 Bob: How long shd last call be? 19:40:25 ... 3 orb 4 weeks 19:40:33 s/orb/or/ 19:40:46 No objections to 3 week Last Call. 19:41:06 http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/sparql#w3c_all 19:41:17 Topic: Need short abstracts for spec directory examples at http://www.w3.org/standards/techs/sparql#w3c_all 19:41:55 Bob: Who will volunteer to write abstracts? 19:42:07 Doug: I'll take a stab at it 19:42:34 + +39.331.574.aaff 19:43:18 Zakim, aaff is asoldano 19:43:18 +asoldano; got it 19:43:24 action: Doug to write up some abstracts 19:43:24 Created ACTION-166 - Write up some abstracts [on Doug Davis - due 2010-06-22]. 19:44:16 Topic: Heartbeat 19:44:20 1-Issue-9610 Eventing: Support WS-Management's heartbeat events http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9610 -wsman 19:44:23 q+ 19:44:30 q+ 19:44:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0004.html 19:44:37 ack tom 19:45:40 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0004.html 19:46:03 q+ 19:46:50 TomRutt: Simplify d ... always send msg at regular intervals 19:47:29 q+ 19:47:34 WuChou: Using count may not good idea 19:47:59 q- 19:48:13 q+ 19:48:24 ack wu 19:48:26 q+ 19:48:29 q+ 19:48:45 -Martin 19:49:05 +Martin_Chapman 19:49:09 TomRutt: Agrees with Wu 19:49:38 Rick: We would like to withdraw proposal 19:50:00 ... WS-Man would like to use it's existing mechanism 19:50:11 q- 19:50:11 q- 19:50:28 ... also \remove GetStatus option 19:50:43 s/\remove/remove/ 19:51:18 ack dug 19:51:28 Doug: Proposal is worthy of consideration for a primer ... later 19:51:39 +1 19:51:51 zakim, where is the echo coming from? 19:51:51 I don't understand your question, gpilz. 19:52:02 zakim, who is noisy? 19:52:14 q+ 19:52:15 dug, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: Tom_Rutt (87%), Ashok_Malhotra (8%), Martin_Chapman (65%) 19:52:21 zakim, mute martin 19:52:21 Martin_Chapman should now be muted 19:52:29 q+ 19:52:50 LOL poor martin 19:52:52 TomRutt: We dod not need to remove what we have or not add a more general feature 19:53:36 s/dod/do/ 19:53:55 ack gp 19:54:10 its a miracle! 19:54:17 its also true 19:54:45 Gil: Keep alive is worse than heartbeat 19:55:10 ... increases shared state by a lot 19:56:19 q- 19:56:57 Rick: The keep-alive uses a maximum interval. If you implement as regular heartbeat the max interval never exceeded 19:57:28 ... can be implemented by alarm clock 19:57:59 ... no need to keep distributed state 19:58:15 +1 to cwna and remove 19:58:26 Bob: Proposal to CNA and remove ... Option f. 19:58:48 q+ 19:58:59 ... remove verify 19:59:25 TomRutt: Lets not take away what we have ... meets a general need 19:59:59 Bob: Do you want option e rather than f? 20:00:18 ack dug 20:00:52 Doug: Disagrees. No need for what we added. That was for WS-Man. Will cause confusion 20:00:54 ok, lets pick one 20:00:57 e or f 20:01:08 zakim, pick one 20:01:08 I don't understand 'pick one', Bob 20:01:16 Doug: Maybe we can add later 20:02:10 who is going to implement getstatus? 20:02:18 Allesio: f 20:02:37 IBM: f 20:02:49 Microsoft: f 20:02:59 Fujistu: e 20:03:07 SoftwareAG: f 20:03:10 not just good work but great work :-) 20:03:13 Avaya: abstain 20:03:21 Oracle: f 20:03:31 Tom_Rutt has joined #ws-ra 20:03:43 Bob: We pick f 20:04:05 ack 20:04:13 rr 20:04:15 RESOLUTION: Issue is resolved by removing the verify feature and reverting to oroginal state 20:04:46 s/Issue/Issue 9610/ 20:05:57 Topic: Issue 9609 20:06:04 proposal at http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=887 20:06:39 2-Issue-9609 Enum: Support WS-Management's optimization of Enumerations with small result sets http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9609 -wsman proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0006.html and in the bug list 20:07:10 TomRutt: Any changes to response to existing spec? 20:07:18 Rick: Yes 20:07:24 s/to/in/ 20:08:38 q+ 20:08:49 ack dug 20:09:09 Doug: Looks like a large premature optimization 20:09:25 ... prefer to make pull an explicit enumerate 20:09:45 Bob: This is what we agreed to 20:10:02 q+ 20:10:28 ack tom 20:10:45 q+ 20:10:52 TomRutt: Then why do we need enumerate 20:11:00 q- 20:11:07 q+ 20:11:12 Doug: You would have a choice on the pull 20:11:26 ack gp 20:11:40 q+ 20:12:35 q- 20:12:36 Gil: Can we change to pull-enumerate? 20:12:47 q 20:13:08 Bob: Let's leave issue of the name aside to the time being 20:13:39 I'd be willing to writeup the proposal 20:13:43 ... would this meet your needs ... first pull alsways enumerate 20:15:14 Bob: Can you write the proposal? 20:15:18 Doug: Yes 20:15:41 s/can/Doug, Can/ 20:16:21 Topic: 3-Issue-9781 WS-Eventing: mandates only subscribe/unsubscribe http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9781 -Li 20:16:33 Li: Explains issue 20:18:22 q+ 20:18:43 LOL 20:19:43 ack dug 20:19:56 Wu: make only subscribe/unsubscribe as manadtory all else optional 20:20:06 q+ 20:20:12 Doug: Should not get rid of GetStatus 20:20:21 ack wu 20:20:45 q+ 20:21:41 q+ 20:21:47 ack dug 20:22:06 Doug: Other mechanisms are not described in the spec 20:22:16 ... defends GetStatus 20:22:22 q+ 20:22:43 ack gp 20:22:47 ... cost is negligible 20:23:34 Gil: Impl cost of GetStatus is low 20:23:47 ... optional features in the spec are bad 20:24:07 ack tom 20:24:08 ... Support GetStatus 20:24:15 TomRutt: +1 20:24:39 ... GetStatus is fundamental 20:25:14 Bob: So we agree we can drop Renew 20:25:52 Doug: I don't think Renew is that critical but easy to implement 20:26:30 +1 to dug on keeping renew 20:26:41 Bob: You want to keep the whole set 20:26:58 Wu: Originally Renew and GetStatus were optional 20:27:30 Bob: Any objection toclosing with no action 20:27:51 Wu: We would like only 2 operations subscribe/unsubscribe 20:28:13 q+ 20:30:18 ack tom 20:30:23 TomRutt: Optionality is evil 20:30:40 +1 to Tom 20:30:43 +1 to tom 20:30:57 +1 20:30:58 ... cost to implement is very low 20:31:23 Bob: CNA? 20:31:46 No objections. Issue closed with no action 20:31:47 status of WSDL pointers? 20:32:24 RESOLUTION: Issue 9781 closed with no action 20:32:49 Topic: -Issue-8284 All: references to WSDL 1.1 should be to BP-corrected version http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 -Pilz (BP 1.2 and 2.0 status) 20:33:01 Ram: There will a proposal soon. 20:33:04 - +1.831.713.aabb 20:33:05 -Vikas 20:33:06 bye 20:33:07 -Wu_Chou 20:33:09 -Rick 20:33:09 -Martin_Chapman 20:33:10 -asoldano 20:33:12 -Bob_Freund 20:33:14 MartinC has left #ws-ra 20:33:14 -Doug_Davis 20:33:15 -Tom_Rutt 20:33:16 -[Microsoft] 20:33:24 rrsagent, generate minutes 20:33:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-ws-ra-minutes.html Bob 20:33:35 rrsagent, make logs public 20:38:28 -Katy 20:39:36 Bob has left #ws-ra 20:52:53 -Ashok_Malhotra 20:52:55 WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended 20:52:57 Attendees were Doug_Davis, Bob_Freund, +1.571.262.aaaa, [Microsoft], +1.831.713.aabb, Wu_Chou, Vikas, Tom_Rutt, Ashok_Malhotra, +1.800.456.aacc, Rick, +3531803aadd, Martin, 20:53:00 ... +44.196.281.aaee, Katy, +39.331.574.aaff, asoldano, Martin_Chapman 21:00:24 gpilz has left #ws-ra