ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions

CURIE collisions

CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions

State:

CLOSED

Product:

2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1

Raised by:

Manu Sporny

Opened on:

2011-04-19

Description:

From Niklas Lindström:

The Working Group should consider whether or not CURIEs should be further restricted in order to not conflict with future Internet protocol schemes.

For instance, not allowing CURIEs in that space to use anything after the prefix+':' other than say an isegment-nz-nc from RFC 3987, or something to that effect (like a "[A-Za-z0-9_-.]+" regexp).

More in the initial e-mail that started the thread:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Apr/0046.html

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-28)
2. Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-01-28)
3. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-26)
4. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
5. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-26)
6. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-26)
7. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
8. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-26)
9. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-25)
10. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-25)
11. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-25)
12. Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-01-24)
13. Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-24)
14. A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-24)
15. My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-19)
16. Re: Comment from RDF WG on CURIE Alignment with SPARQL and Turtle (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-01-19)
17. Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-06-09)
18. Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-05-31)
19. Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-05-31)
20. Re: Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2011-05-31)
21. Official RDFa Response: ISSUE-90: CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-05-28)
22. Re: Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC (from benjamin.adrian@dfki.de on 2011-05-19)
23. Re: Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2011-05-19)
24. Re: Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-05-18)
25. Telecon Agenda - May 19th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-05-18)
26. Re: Telecon Agenda - May 12th 2011, 1400 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2011-05-12)
27. Telecon Agenda - May 12th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-05-11)
28. Telecon Agenda - May 5th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-05-02)
29. Re: Telecon Agenda - April 28th 2011, 1400 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2011-04-28)
30. Re: Telecon Agenda - April 28th 2011, 1400 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2011-04-28)
31. Telecon Agenda - April 28th 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-04-25)
32. Telecon Agenda - April 21st 2011, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2011-04-19)
33. ISSUE-90 (CURIE collisions): CURIEorURI Value Space Collisions [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-19)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log