Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Agenda-2009-04-28

From SPARQL Working Group

Jump to: navigation, search

Call in details

When joining please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, identify yourself to Zakim on IRC

Date of Call: Tuesday April 28, 2009
Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (France)
Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (UK)
Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/sparql])
Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
Duration: 90 minutes
Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
Scribe: Ivan Mikhailov (Scribe List)
Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-04-28

Note 90 minute duration.

Admin
- PROPOSED: Approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2009-04-21
- Next meeting: 2009-05-05 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT ? Do we skip telecon the day before F2F?
Logistics
- Scribe next time: Chimezie Ogbuji (Scribe List)
Liaisons
- Anything to report?
- OWL WG (Bijan)
- HCLS (Eric)
- XQuery (Eric)
- RIF WG (Axel)
- RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
Action/issue status - via tracker: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/
Face-to-face next week
- Confirm attendees
- Logistics questions?
  - Timing
- Agenda
  - Suggested agenda:
    - 0.5 day discussing features
    - 0.5 day discussing feature 1
    - 0.5 day discussing feature 2
    - 0.5 day discussing feature 3
  - Suggested discussion points:
    - Naming (SPARQL 1.1 vs. SPARQL 2 vs. ???)
    - Survey of existing designs
    - Straw man designs
    - Test cases
Feature Survey http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/
- Survey open until Friday, May 1
- Current results are at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/results
- See Condorcet results from SteveH at http://plugin.org.uk/misc/votes.svg
- Can we reach consensus on a few features? Current front-runners per Condorcet are:
  - Aggreagtes
  - Subselects
  - Update
- Discussion around features with strong advocacy that seem "at risk"
  - SPARQL/OWL (Bijan)
  - LimitPerResource (Kjetil, Alex)
  - ParameterizedInference (Chime)
  - AccessingRdfLists (EricP)
  - SPARQLX (Bijan)
  - Others?