ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document?

ReqReq

Should we have an umbrella requirements document?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

APIs — General

Raised by:

Robin Berjon

Opened on:

2009-09-23

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Corrected 2009-09-30 minutes for approval - v3 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-05)
2. Revised draft minutes 2009-09-30 (retry) (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-05)
3. Revised draft minutes 2009-09-30 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-10-05)
4. Re: approved minutes from 2009-09-23 (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-30)
5. Re: Draft Minutes 2009-09-30 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-30)
6. approved minutes from 2009-09-23 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-30)
7. Draft Minutes 2009-09-30 (from robin@berjon.com on 2009-09-30)
8. Re: Draft Minutes 2009-09-23 (from dom@w3.org on 2009-09-30)
9. Draft Minutes 2009-09-23 (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-29)
10. Re: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-28)
11. Re: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from robin@robineko.com on 2009-09-28)
12. Re: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from robin@robineko.com on 2009-09-28)
13. ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com on 2009-09-23)
14. Re: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from john@jkemp.net on 2009-09-23)
15. RE: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com on 2009-09-23)
16. Re: ISSUE-22: Should we have an umbrella requirements document? (from frederick.hirsch@nokia.com on 2009-09-23)

Related notes:

Display change log