IRC log of awwsw on 2009-05-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:45:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #awwsw
- 12:45:32 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-awwsw-irc
- 12:45:44 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #awwsw
- 12:45:50 [jar]
- zakim, this will be awwsw
- 12:45:50 [Zakim]
- ok, jar; I see TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM scheduled to start in 15 minutes
- 12:46:23 [mhausenblas]
- mhausenblas has joined #awwsw
- 12:48:41 [mhausenblas]
- hi there
- 12:50:12 [mhausenblas]
- not sure if we have a fixed agenda (didn't see one) ...
- 12:51:51 [mhausenblas]
- so FYI, after last telecon I took TimBL's http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont# ontology and turned it into a diagrams
- 12:52:01 [mhausenblas]
- http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswGenOntDiagrams
- 12:52:10 [mhausenblas]
- this may help us today
- 13:00:19 [Zakim]
- TAG_(AWWSW)9:00AM has now started
- 13:00:20 [Zakim]
- + +1.781.643.aaaa
- 13:00:40 [jar]
- hi.
- 13:01:14 [Zakim]
- +mhausenblas
- 13:01:16 [Zakim]
- -mhausenblas
- 13:01:16 [Zakim]
- +mhausenblas
- 13:01:36 [jar]
- zakim, +1.781 is jar
- 13:01:36 [Zakim]
- +jar; got it
- 13:01:40 [Zakim]
- + +1.512.342.aabb
- 13:02:07 [mhausenblas]
- Zakim, aabb is David
- 13:02:07 [Zakim]
- +David; got it
- 13:05:33 [Zakim]
- +Alan
- 13:05:58 [alanr]
- alanr has joined #awwsw
- 13:06:07 [alanr]
- zakim, who is here?
- 13:06:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see jar, mhausenblas, David, Alan
- 13:06:08 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see alanr, mhausenblas, Zakim, RRSAgent, jar, trackbot
- 13:07:12 [mhausenblas]
- http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswGenOntDiagrams
- 13:07:24 [mhausenblas]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/gen/ont#
- 13:07:45 [Zakim]
- +TimBL
- 13:10:22 [dbooth]
- dbooth has joined #awwsw
- 13:10:34 [dbooth]
- rrsagent, where am i?
- 13:10:34 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-awwsw-irc#T13-10-34
- 13:10:54 [dbooth]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 13:11:59 [jar]
- What is an example of an IR that is not time generic?
- 13:12:19 [jar]
- Are time generic and time specific mutually exclusive?
- 13:12:53 [jar]
- TimBL: Let's try where they're disjoint.
- 13:15:42 [jar]
- Michael: How about if we look for an example of each of the classes?
- 13:15:44 [timbl]
- timbl has joined #awwsw
- 13:16:10 [timbl]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2009May/0071.html is time-specific
- 13:17:20 [timbl]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/ is time-generic
- 13:18:44 [jar]
- time-specific = has same representations at all times?
- 13:20:05 [dbooth]
- forall time t1, t2 and any other request inputs i1, i2, f(t1, i1)=f(t2, i2).
- 13:20:44 [jar]
- A resource can be updated, but if it's time specific, then the update doesn't lead to changes in the representations?
- 13:20:49 [jar]
- can't?
- 13:21:07 [dbooth]
- hmm, the rule that I just gave also fixes it over other inputs. Not sure that was the intent.
- 13:21:33 [mhausenblas]
- q+
- 13:21:57 [dbooth]
- Okay, lemme try again: forall time t1, t2 and for any input i, f(t1, i) = f(t2, i).
- 13:22:06 [mhausenblas]
- wondering if the TAG finding http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/alternatives-discovery.html is of any help (and/or has been taken into account so far)
- 13:22:10 [jar]
- if time specific, then when i do an http operation, then i don't need to redo a GET, because it's not changing
- 13:22:21 [jar]
- (that was me recording TimBL)
- 13:22:48 [jar]
- ack next
- 13:22:48 [mhausenblas]
- ack me
- 13:25:39 [timbl]
- It does highliht the ,medium as a dimension.
- 13:25:52 [timbl]
- (print, laptop, mobile, screen etc)
- 13:27:05 [timbl]
- mh, the arrows in the diagram at the bottom of the finding above are links, not relationships.
- 13:27:29 [timbl]
- into design issues
- 13:28:19 [alanr]
- watch out: two spellings (capitalization) of [tT]imeSpecificResource and [cC]ontentTypeSpecificResource
- 13:28:45 [jar]
- David, your "for all time..." needs to be qualified: the equation need only hold when both are defined.
- 13:28:52 [timbl]
- yes, property and class
- 13:30:25 [jar]
- TimBL: a GR is *not* determined solely by its representations
- 13:30:29 [dbooth]
- jar, when both what are defined?
- 13:30:34 [alanr]
- http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswGenOntDiagrams?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=genont-classtree.png
- 13:30:42 [alanr]
- just the class/subclass relations
- 13:30:46 [jar]
- both f(t1, i) and f(t2, i)
- 13:31:06 [dbooth]
- hmm, interesting point.
- 13:31:52 [jar]
- can the set of all r such that r is a representation of g (for some g) be infinite?
- 13:32:04 [jar]
- TimBL: Can be.
- 13:32:44 [jar]
- TimBL: When we measure it via HTTP, we can only make a finite number of measurements.
- 13:34:03 [timbl]
- E.g my blog can contain an ad which has a random integer generated at run time which is unbounded.
- 13:34:56 [timbl]
- One deosn't normally
- 13:37:03 [jar]
- There is a relationship between the server and the generic resource
- 13:37:31 [dbooth]
- jar; What do I learn about the resource by doing a GET?
- 13:37:41 [dbooth]
- dbooth: You learn what one of its representations is.
- 13:38:18 [jar]
- What do I learn about a generic resource by doing a GET?
- 13:38:28 [jar]
- I learn that the returned entity is a rep of the resource, right?
- 13:39:26 [timbl]
- yes
- 13:41:21 [jar]
- Trust is orthogonal to authority, right?
- 13:41:28 [timbl]
- if the returns status was 200
- 13:41:58 [dbooth]
- q+ to answer jonathan's question: By doing a GET on a URI and getting a 200 result, you learn: (1) that the URI identifies an IR; and (2) you learn one of its representations.
- 13:42:55 [jar]
- TimBL: Happy to not talk about authority issues just now
- 13:42:56 [jar]
- q?
- 13:44:14 [jar]
- TimBL: You seem to think the ontology as if it exists in isolation
- 13:44:38 [jar]
- could someone scribe?
- 13:45:36 [dbooth]
- timbl: by sticking RDF in the metadata about a document (indicating that the resource is time-specific IR) then I know that there is no need to fetch it again later.
- 13:45:41 [dbooth]
- (paraphrased)
- 13:46:33 [jar]
- The boundary around an ontology is arbitrary
- 13:46:38 [jar]
- (that was TimBL)
- 13:46:59 [jar]
- Sorry dbooth. you were on the q
- 13:47:28 [jar]
- TimBL: The ontologies aren't in a stack
- 13:49:02 [dbooth]
- Here's a little more I wrote for IRC that pertains to earlier discussion:
- 13:49:18 [dbooth]
- I have treated ftrr:IR as a function of two inputs (Time x Request), but if desired we could break the Request input into separate inputs such as: Language, ContentType, Client, OtherRequestInput.
- 13:49:25 [dbooth]
- Then each *-specific resource would just be holding the representations constant across different values of that input. So a language-specific resource would be:
- 13:49:31 [dbooth]
- forall Language l1, l1, and any Time t and ContentType ct and Client c and OtherRequestInput o: f(t, l1, ct, c, o) = f(t, l2, ct, c, o).
- 13:49:40 [jar]
- bye
- 13:49:45 [Zakim]
- -David
- 13:52:51 [jar]
- jar: Does there exist a GR g such that there is no R with R a representation of g (at any time)
- 13:52:52 [jar]
- ?
- 13:53:38 [jar]
- (In Roy's model, the answer is yes.)
- 13:55:42 [jar]
- TimBL: Boundary case we don't care about.
- 13:56:12 [jar]
- E.g. something you can PUT or POST to, but you never get a 200
- 13:57:02 [jar]
- michael: Not sure that's a border case
- 13:59:31 [jar]
- I get confused because we go back and forth between ontology and protocol
- 14:00:02 [jar]
- TimBL: It would be mathematically useful to have a GR that no reps.
- 14:00:53 [jar]
- e.g. no one has written one yet.
- 14:01:11 [timbl]
- Not practically useful
- 14:01:54 [jar]
- Could you define G = the top resource? (every representation is a rep of G?)
- 14:02:02 [jar]
- TimBL: Yes, but not useful
- 14:02:20 [jar]
- So utility is not a requirement of a GR.
- 14:02:47 [jar]
- TimBL: Bad ideas are not outlawed by the ontology
- 14:03:23 [jar]
- TimBL: but in webarch, we say that consistency is a good idea [?]
- 14:03:36 [jar]
- can't we let the market decide?
- 14:04:06 [jar]
- TimBL: society will hold you to what you serve according to what it demands
- 14:04:14 [timbl]
- ~
- 14:05:09 [mhausenblas]
- Michael will take care of organising the next telecon on 26 May
- 14:05:27 [mhausenblas]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 14:05:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas
- 14:05:37 [alanr]
- Here is a class tree with labels that describe how I understand what the intent is: http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswGenOntDiagrams?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=genont-different-labels.png
- 14:05:48 [mhausenblas]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 14:06:44 [mhausenblas]
- [adjourned]
- 14:06:53 [mhausenblas]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 14:06:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas
- 14:07:01 [Zakim]
- -TimBL
- 14:07:01 [mhausenblas]
- Zakim, bye
- 14:07:01 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #awwsw
- 14:07:02 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.781.643.aaaa, mhausenblas, jar, +1.512.342.aabb, David, Alan, TimBL
- 14:07:15 [mhausenblas]
- RRSAgent, draft minutes
- 14:07:15 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/05/12-awwsw-minutes.html mhausenblas
- 14:07:28 [mhausenblas]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:07:28 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items