See also: IRC log
<Yves> trackbot, start telcon
<trackbot> Date: 24 March 2009
<mphillip> Scribe: mphillip
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/72
Roland: Incorporated Derek's changes into spec.
<Roland> latest version: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
Derek: Looks good
Roland: Will write back to Dongbo on TopicReplyTo
close action-72
<trackbot> ACTION-72 Incorporate Derek's text into spec. closed
Derek: No progress on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/68
Roland: No progress seen from
Eric on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/70
... No progress from Peter on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/71
... Any thoughts on http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/73
?
I couldn't get excited about changing to a hyphenated naming convention
Roland: Nor could I. We will discuss further when Eric is on the call.
<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Feb/0008.html
Roland: Dongbo's comments on the wording that a conforming implementation MUST implement the IRI specification
ACTION Roland to examine the wording of the conformance requirements section
<trackbot> Created ACTION-74 - Examine the wording of the conformance requirements section [on Roland Merrick - due 2009-03-31].
Roland: Believe that action 72
satisfies Dongbo's second point
... Her last point is how an implementation would reject a
"queue" or "topic" URI if it does not support those
variants
<Roland> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Jan/0020.html
ACTION Phil to look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant
<trackbot> Created ACTION-75 - Look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant [on Phil Adams - due 2009-03-31].
Roland: Last link refers to issue raised by Derek on inconsistencies with the spelling of "NON_PERSISTENT"
Derek: This has not be fixed in the specification yet
<scribe> ACTION: Roland to change the Binding specification to use "NON_PERSISTENT" in 5 places where we use "NONPERSISTENT" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-76 - Change the Binding specification to use \"NON_PERSISTENT\" in 5 places where we use \"NONPERSISTENT\" [on Roland Merrick - due 2009-03-31].
<scribe> ScribeNick: Mark
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Phil/Peter/g Found Scribe: mphillip Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip WARNING: No scribe lines found matching previous ScribeNick pattern: <Mark> ... Found ScribeNick: Mark WARNING: No scribe lines found matching ScribeNick pattern: <Mark> ... ScribeNicks: Mark, mphillip WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Derek Peter Roland SW_RIF ScribeNick W3C_AC WS_SOAP-JM XML_ET-TF Yves active minutes mphillip next others rmerric scheduled start to trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Eric) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ +, Amy WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: +, Amy, Erix, Eric) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Eric, Amy Regrets: Eric Amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Mar/0020.html Found Date: 24 Mar 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/24-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: roland WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]