See also: IRC log
SAZ: is there an update?
CI: need to finish editing and have look at
schema
... doubts about status of the conformance section, which relates to
questionable status in other docs as well
... some open questions that will be included as editor's notes
SAZ: any questions that demand feedback?
CI: HtmlPointer - an outstanding action or what
is its status?
... placeholder remains
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/actions/open
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tracker/actions/58
CI: will provide next draft of Pointers in RDF for first meeting in January
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20081216
JK: changed 'domain of' and 'range of'; using
format of DLs
... more internal linking from properties to classes and vice versa
... issue in Sec 3.1 regarding range of body property
SAZ: section entitled 'Status of this document'
needs chnages; Shadi will do
... what about SPARQL queries?
Note: I have an outstanding action to look at SPARQL and POWDR for how they handle conformance
SAZ: keep it open but lean toward Content in RDF?
JK: may not be possible to have range of cnt:content if one wnated to have multiple pieces of content
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20081126#Assertor
JK: leave range unspecified and keep
introductory paragraph
... would a conforming Http in RDF-reading application be required to process
cnt vocabulary?
SAZ: yes - should expect cnt-pocessing
CI: strange to suggest that http in RDF apps would also need to conform to Content in RDF vocabulary
agree with leaving it more open
RESOLUTION: leave body property open but encourage the use of cnt:content to represent body
SAZ: up to JK as to how to express this in the
document
... will resolve conformance issues in EARL 1.0 Schema document and then
apply that resolution to other docs
+1
<carlosI> +1
JK: removed schema from document but on-line version needs to be synced
<shadi> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/http.rdfs>
<shadi> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/content.rdfs>
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/WD-Content-in-RDF-20081216
SAZ: using xsd data types?
CI: makes sense
+1
JK: xsd data types already there
SAZ: remainder of group should review
document
... comments about WG in general before winter break?
... Pointers in RDF moving along
... conformance questions need to be resolved for toher docs
SAZ: Jan 7 or Jan 14?
JK: jan 7
+1 for Jan 7
CI: jan 7
Happy Holidays, everyone