See also: IRC log
<scribe> Meeting: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
<JR> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2008/WD-ATAG20-20081025/WD-ATAG20-20081025#gl-manage-alts
<scribe> scribe: jeanne
Authors have the opportunity to accept, modify, or reject any equivalent alternative supplied by the authoring tool, prior to insertion.
<JR> If the authoring tool supplies equivalent alternatives, provide authors with the have the opportunity to accept, modify, or reject the alternatives, prior to insertion. (Level A)
<JR> If the authoring tool supplies equivalent alternatives, provide authors with the opportunity to accept, modify, or reject the alternatives, prior to insertion. (Level A)
<JR> If the authoring tool supplies equivalent alternatives, provide authors with the opportunity to accept, modify, or reject the alternatives. (Level A)
issue: Rework B.2.4 to be more clear
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-173 - Rework B.2.4 to be more clear ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/tracker/issues/173/edit .
<scribe> ACTION: JR to write proposal for rework of B.2.4 Issue-173 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/03-au-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-41 - Write proposal for rework of B.2.4 Issue-173 [on Jan Richards - due 2008-11-10].
<JR> B.1.3.1 Automatic Accessible (Level A): If the authoring tool automatically generates content, then that content meets WCAG Level A prior to publishing.
<JR> B.2.5.1 Templates "A" Accessible: If the authoring tool automatically selects templates or pre-authored content, then the selection meets WCAG Level A when used. (Level A)
discussion on whether the accessibility status of the template can be known.
js: recommends removing the phrase "if known" because it undermines the entire guideline.
AR: agrees.
SN: it makes sense. It seems to take the teeth out of it. PRoviding the status seems appropriate and reasonable.
<scribe> ACTION: JS to update the B.2.5.3 and B.2.5.7 to remove "if known" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/03-au-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-42 - Update the B.2.5.3 and B.2.5.7 to remove \"if known\" [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-11-10].
discussion of B.2.5.7 and the appropriate level. Currently AA, discussion of making it A.
JS: the use case seems to be
widget repository and that seems to be AA
... recommended looking at the complexity of the tool as a way
of deciding the level-- blogs and wikis as A, CMS as AA and
development environments for AAA.
JR: confusing. If the tool only
had its own homebuilt templates, it would just know the status.
That would seem to be A.
... Later on, checkers are going to make them aware of it.
JS: B.2.5.7 is so broad that it is difficult to see where the level is.
<scribe> ACTION: JS to draft a new proposal for B.2.5.7 to make it more clear what level it should be. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/03-au-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-43 - Draft a new proposal for B.2.5.7 to make it more clear what level it should be. [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2008-11-10].
end of meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Present: Jan Andrew Sueann jeanne Regrets: AnnM Jutta TimB Got date from IRC log name: 03 Nov 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/03-au-minutes.html People with action items: jr js WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]