14:43:33 RRSAgent has joined #forms 14:43:33 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc 14:43:39 rrsagent, make log public 14:43:42 zakim, who is here? 14:43:42 On the phone I see Charlie 14:43:43 On IRC I see RRSAgent, John_Boyer, Zakim, Charlie, wellsk, shepazu, nick, Steven, trackbot-ng 14:43:47 unl has joined #forms 14:44:05 Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference 14:44:11 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0067.html 14:44:18 John_Boyer has changed the topic to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0067.html 14:44:27 Chair: John 14:44:30 Scribe: Leigh 14:44:33 Regrets: Erik 14:45:04 zakim, who is here? 14:45:04 On the phone I see Charlie 14:45:05 On IRC I see unl, RRSAgent, John_Boyer, Zakim, Charlie, wellsk, shepazu, nick, Steven, trackbot-ng 14:45:32 +John_Boyer 14:46:04 +wellsk 14:46:14 +unl 14:46:25 zakim, mute me 14:46:25 unl should now be muted 14:46:47 Roger has joined #forms 14:47:30 zakim, code? 14:47:30 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Roger 14:48:29 zakim, who is here? 14:48:29 On the phone I see Charlie, John_Boyer, wellsk, unl (muted) 14:48:30 On IRC I see Roger, unl, RRSAgent, John_Boyer, Zakim, Charlie, wellsk, shepazu, nick, Steven, trackbot-ng 14:48:37 zakim, dial steven-617 14:48:37 ok, Steven; the call is being made 14:48:39 +Steven 14:49:20 Mark says: I will be there...but about 15-20 minutes late. 14:49:58 klotz has joined #forms 14:50:02 +Roger 14:50:10 zakim, mute me 14:50:10 Roger should now be muted 14:51:28 +Leigh_Klotz 14:51:50 scribenick: Leigh_Klotz 14:52:07 -Leigh_Klotz 14:52:41 +Leigh_Klotz 14:53:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0067.html 14:58:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0100.html 14:59:53 i'm experiencing many drop outs. call back in again 15:00:02 -unl 15:00:42 +unl 15:00:53 zakim, mute me 15:00:53 unl should now be muted 15:04:30 nic1 has joined #forms 15:04:43 nic1 do you hear us? 15:04:50 zakim, code? 15:04:50 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), nic1 15:05:38 +Nick_van_den_Bleeken 15:05:49 John: What does "NameTest" mean? I think what we ended up with, two Septembers ago, is that as an XPath expression is getting evaluated, any time we match a NameTest, we add that node to the list of nodes that are being referred to by the XPath expression. I think we did that so there would be more responsiveness of the compute system to predicate changes ("dynamic"), so if certain changes to the XPath happened, the various calculations would be able to detect 15:05:49 that a change of referencing it happened and would know to get recalculated. Nick has an example, and has run into some problems. If you execute the XPath expression he gives, you'll notice that it matches both of the 'a' nodes; if you read the expression from left to right, and look at the predicate next to the 'a', you'll notice it's trying to match 'a' whose attr value is 'X', but the way we've written the spec, it puts a in with x. So if any of the a elem 15:05:50 ents change, we respond to that; more importantly, if any of the attr nodes in any of the a's change, we'll respond to that as well, and that's part of the key. For any 'a' value that we match, we have a NameTest against each of those attributes as well, so all of the nodes that feed a predicate are considered. This seemed like a good idea. The alternative was that we would only register the register as dependencies those identified by a completed Location St 15:05:55 ep of an XPath expression, so from the predicate of the first 'a' step we might record only the element 'a' that matched the predicate. So the question was should we record only the matched nodes, or feed in all those that are tested. We went with the broader test, the one that keeps all references; that means we will follow all calculations. If you notice in the 'a' element, if you imagine that being changed to 'X', we detect that change and re-run whatever 15:06:02 calculates might have that full expression; whereas with narrower references (location step) only the 'a' that has attribute 'X' would have been recorded and if you change the value 'Z 15:10:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0086.html 15:11:02 markbirbeck has joined #forms 15:11:54 zakim, code? 15:11:54 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 15:12:45 waves back! :) 15:13:22 + +1.208.761.aaaa 15:13:27 akim, i am aaaa 15:13:34 zakim, i am aaaa 15:13:34 +markbirbeck; got it 15:13:53 http://xformstest.org/klotz/2008-05-28.txt 15:14:35 * me too 15:15:00 I'm feeling fine 15:16:31 I don't like to drop does extra dependencies, because I hate to add a rebuild to fix it 15:16:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0100.html 15:16:48 (but that is my opinion) 15:18:53 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0086.html 15:23:05 for the record, I don't have anything against the current wording, it adds the correct nodes to the dependency list in most cases I guess. And personally I only would like only to make changes if the change that __doesn't__ add extra cases where a manual rebuild is necessary. 15:23:22 (but this is what John is saying also) 15:24:44 agree with that 15:25:40 i would like to keep the current behaviour, because this way can handle some dynamic dependencies just by static analysis 15:26:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0086.html 15:26:35 yes 15:26:51 unmute me 15:26:57 zakim, unmute me 15:26:57 Nick_van_den_Bleeken was not muted, nic1 15:27:15 zakim, mute me 15:27:15 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:32:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0047.html 15:32:30 ACTION: John Boyer to write a clarifying note in XForms 1.1 regarding dependencies and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0100.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0086.html 15:32:30 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John 15:32:30 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer) 15:33:35 I would expect also block-level elements 15:34:59 you can style for example a as a block level element 15:35:31 UI.textOrStructureOrAnything 15:39:03 (in XSL-FO flow is an element, containing all the flo stuf....) 15:39:11 UI.Inline 15:39:18 UI.Flow 15:39:22 UI.Contents ? 15:39:32 ACTION: John_Boyer to change XForms 1.1 document and Schema to rename UI.Inline to UI.Flow as a non-normative, editorial change. 15:39:32 Sorry, couldn't find user - John_Boyer 15:39:41 but don't have a hard feeling about it ;) 15:42:37 s/UI.Flow/UI.Content and UI.Content.Extension 15:42:43 rrsagent, make minutes 15:42:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-minutes.html Steven 15:44:24 i can do that 15:44:27 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20080415/ 15:44:48 XmlHttpRequest 15:45:07 i can take events then 15:45:51 link for events? 15:46:11 ACTION: Mark Birbeck to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20080415/ and present straw set of comments for discussion and approval at F2F. 15:46:11 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Mark 15:46:11 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. mseaborn, mbirbeck) 15:48:10

home

15:49:29 * Leigh, are you doing the action for me to review XML events too? 15:49:39 Charlie I need the URI for the document for you to review. 15:51:13 xml events 2: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xml-events-20070216/ 15:51:20 * i was looking too! 15:51:27 ACTION: Charlie Wiecha to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xml-events-20070216/ and present straw set of comments for discussion and approval at F2F. 15:51:27 Sorry, couldn't find user - Charlie 15:51:52 http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-events2/ 15:51:57 is the generic name 15:52:25 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/ 15:53:18 ACTION: Leigh Klotz to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/ by June 10th. 15:53:18 Created ACTION-463 - Klotz to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/ by June 10th. [on Leigh Klotz, Jr. - due 2008-06-04]. 15:55:52 Steven has joined #forms 15:56:09 zakim, who is noisy? 15:56:15 http://rdfa.info/ 15:56:21 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: John_Boyer (36%), Leigh_Klotz (9%) 15:56:54 http://planetxforms.org/ 15:57:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0043.html 15:58:25 Action: Steven to post http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0043.html to news 15:58:25 Created ACTION-464 - Post http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0043.html to news [on Steven Pemberton - due 2008-06-04]. 16:02:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0060.html 16:02:34 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0061.html 16:04:23 I started to write XForms 1.2 spec text, and it is taking quite some time to just change anything, probably bcz. it is the first time 16:04:46 so I don't think I will have much time beside that before the ftf 16:07:32 zakim, unmute me 16:07:32 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should no longer be muted 16:08:55 Steven has joined #forms 16:09:44 i would love to help implement the simplified stuff 16:10:35 You might not have a choice Charlie. ;) 16:11:58 In the future I can also allocate some time to work on it (during my employers time) 16:12:15 Excellent nic1! :) 16:13:12 I've also had interest from one of the big Ajax library creators, who has their own XML language. 16:13:57 (Interest to add people to work on the library, that is.) 16:16:22 We don't have an announcement of Ubiquity on our homepage either 16:16:33 Anyone want to suggest text? 16:16:58 Steven...would rather get a nicer looking sample available first. :) 16:17:05 -markbirbeck 16:17:07 -Charlie 16:17:07 -unl 16:17:08 http://xformstest.org/klotz/shibumiscript/2008/05/ubiquity-xforms.html 16:17:08 -John_Boyer 16:17:09 bye 16:17:09 -Roger 16:17:11 Charlie has left #forms 16:17:12 -wellsk 16:17:13 -Nick_van_den_Bleeken 16:17:15 -Steven 16:17:16 -Leigh_Klotz 16:17:17 HTML_Forms()10:45AM has ended 16:17:19 Attendees were Charlie, John_Boyer, wellsk, unl, Steven, Roger, Leigh_Klotz, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, +1.208.761.aaaa, markbirbeck 16:17:23 John_Boyer has joined #forms 16:17:34 rrsagent, make minutes 16:17:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-minutes.html John_Boyer 16:17:42 zakim, who is here? 16:17:42 apparently HTML_Forms()10:45AM has ended, John_Boyer 16:17:43 On IRC I see John_Boyer, Steven, markbirbeck, nic1, klotz, unl, RRSAgent, Zakim, wellsk, shepazu, trackbot-ng 16:17:44 wellsk has left #forms 16:17:52 rrsagent, bye 16:17:52 I see 6 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-actions.rdf : 16:17:52 ACTION: John Boyer to write a clarifying note in XForms 1.1 regarding dependencies and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0100.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Apr/0086.html [1] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-32-30 16:17:52 ACTION: John_Boyer to change XForms 1.1 document and Schema to rename UI.Inline to UI.Flow as a non-normative, editorial change. [2] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-39-32 16:17:52 ACTION: Mark Birbeck to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20080415/ and present straw set of comments for discussion and approval at F2F. [3] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-46-11 16:17:52 ACTION: Charlie Wiecha to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xml-events-20070216/ and present straw set of comments for discussion and approval at F2F. [4] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-51-27 16:17:52 ACTION: Leigh Klotz to review http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-curie-20080506/ by June 10th. [5] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-53-18 16:17:52 ACTION: Steven to post http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008May/0043.html to news [6] 16:17:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/28-forms-irc#T15-58-25 16:17:54 Steven: Maybe announce it early next week? 16:18:09 as you wish Mark 16:18:19 John_Boyer has left #forms