<Roland> 06zakim, who is on the phone?01

<Roland> 06Zakim, who is on the phone?01

<Roland> 06Scribe: markPhillips

Draft spec

roland: A couple of updates to make

1. The namespace needs to be updated

philippe: Recommend using ns namespace so that dates do not need to be updated

<Roland> 06www.w3c.org/ns/soap-jms ?

<plh> http://www.w3.org/ns/soap-jms

<Roland> http://www.w3.org/2008/06/soap-jms

<plh> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/soap-jms

The undated namespace would be the final namespace (for use at the CR stage). In the interim we should use a dated namespace for each draft of the spec.

<plh> http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/soapjms

<plh> "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"

<plh> "http://www.w3.org/ns/soap/bindings/JMS/"

<plh> "http://www.w3.org/2008/06/soap/bindings/JMS/"

RESOLUTION: First working draft will use the year and month namespace (e.g. "http://www.w3.org/2008/06/soap/bindings/JMS/"). The final recommendation will be undated ( "http://www.w3.org/ns/soap/bindings/JMS/")

Testing conformance

roland: How should we construct a test plan?

<plh> http://dev.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/test-suite/Dashboard.html

plh: No best practices per se. For WSDL 2 an interchange format was used to capture the WSDL component model and testing was performed by comparing the interchange formats created by different implementations

For wire formats they defined a canonical representation of SOAP messages described by WSDL then compared to the wire format messages generated by different implementations

PhilAdams: Do we need to specify the API calls used to construct messages? If so we need to document them in the spec.

alewis: The spec implies the calls which are necessary. The only thing we have in common is the API.

PhilAdams: The test suite could act as the receiver (or producer) for messages and validate them

alewis: The advantage of the WSDL model is that a declarative and correct representation of messages can be produced and validated in isolation

roland: could we write up the different proposals for discussion

<scribe> ACTION: PhilAdams to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - PhilAdams

<plh> trackbot-ng, status

<scribe> ACTION: Amelia to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-6 - Write up a test proposal due next week [on Amelia Lewis - due 2008-06-03].

<plh> ACTION: Phil to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-7 - Write up a test proposal due next week [on Phil Adams - due 2008-06-03].

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133  of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: markphillips
Inferring Scribes: markphillips
Default Present: alewis, Roland, Phil, Peter, Plh, Derek, +0196270aaaa, MarkPhillips, Bhakti
Present: alewis Roland Phil Peter Plh Derek +0196270aaaa MarkPhillips Bhakti
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008May/0042.html
Got date from IRC log name: 27 May 2008
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html
People with action items: amelia phil philadams

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.