19:54:53 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:54:53 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/04/14-au-irc 19:54:59 Zakim, this will be AUWG 19:54:59 ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 55 minutes ago 19:55:05 Meeting: WAI AU 19:55:30 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0002.html 19:55:39 Scribe: Jan 19:55:55 Regrets: Ann M., Tim B. 19:59:46 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 19:59:53 +[Microsoft] 20:00:04 + +1.603.496.aaaa 20:00:47 +??P5 20:01:06 +Treviranus 20:01:45 +[IBM] 20:01:47 zakim, [Microsoft] is really RShaffner 20:01:47 +RShaffner; got it 20:02:22 zakim, [IBM] is really MSquillace 20:02:22 +MSquillace; got it 20:03:35 zakim, +1.603.496.aaaa 20:03:35 I don't understand '+1.603.496.aaaa', Jan 20:03:49 zakim, +1.603.496.aaaa, is really Dana 20:03:49 sorry, Jan, I do not recognize a party named '+1.603.496.aaaa,' 20:04:20 zakim, who is on the call 20:04:20 I don't understand 'who is on the call', Jan 20:04:25 zakim, who is on the phone 20:04:25 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', Jan 20:04:34 zakim, who's on the call? 20:04:34 On the phone I see RShaffner, +1.603.496.aaaa, ??P5, Treviranus, MSquillace 20:04:49 zakim, +1.603.496.aaaa is really Dana 20:04:49 +Dana; got it 20:04:59 zakim, ??P5 is really Jan 20:04:59 +Jan; got it 20:05:02 zakim, who's on the call? 20:05:02 On the phone I see RShaffner, Dana, Jan, Treviranus, MSquillace 20:05:15 Chair: Jutta Treviranus 20:05:19 +Greg_Pisocky 20:06:28 Topic: Introductions 20:08:11 Topic: 1. Action item review 20:08:23 Topic: JR to Set up a repository document for the ATAG 2.0 implementations 20:10:14 JR: Based on checklist done by Roberto Scano...will be live later in the week 20:11:01 JT: Maybe also add links to legislation that includes or will include links to ATAG2 20:14:10 jutta has joined #au 20:14:49 Topic: MS to Investigate what it takes to inject some implementations into Web 20:14:50 tools in Eclipse 20:16:00 MS: When do think CR will happen? 20:17:43 JR: Several months after Last Call 20:18:03 Topic: MS to To propose a way to address redundancy of A.2.3 and A.1.2 20:18:13 Reed has joined #au 20:18:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0001.html 20:25:16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2008AprJun/0004.html 20:26:30 JR: 20:26:35 JR: but I'm not sure we can require A.1.2.1. 20:26:38 MS: Example? 20:26:46 RS: What about DOM? 20:27:13 danalouise has joined #au 20:27:17 RS: But I do agree with Mike...if one is provided use it 20:27:43 MS: Flexible with this 20:27:59 MS: Closer look at techs showed that these are different things 20:28:08 MS: A.1.2 vs. A2.3 20:28:43 JR: Adding Web-based tool example 20:29:08 RS: We can say...look check if architecture is avaialbe, if not A.2.3 still applies 20:30:01 MS: No problem with A.1.23 and A.1.24 20:32:43 Action MS: Write a proposal for rewording A.1.2 and title of A.2.3 20:39:45 JR: Next 28 April 2008? 20:40:01 -MSquillace 20:40:03 -RShaffner 20:40:04 JR: Next 28 April 2008. 20:40:04 -Greg_Pisocky 20:40:05 -Dana 20:40:05 -Treviranus 20:40:15 -Jan 20:40:16 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended 20:40:17 Attendees were Treviranus, RShaffner, MSquillace, Dana, Jan, Greg_Pisocky 20:41:58 RRSAgent, make minutes 20:41:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/04/14-au-minutes.html Jan 20:42:05 RRSAgent, set logs public 20:42:11 Zakim, bye 20:42:11 Zakim has left #au 20:42:16 RRSAgent, bye 20:42:16 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/14-au-actions.rdf : 20:42:16 ACTION: MS to Write a proposal for rewording A.1.2 and title of A.2.3 [1] 20:42:16 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/14-au-irc#T20-32-43