See also: IRC log
Dmitri: I've looked a bit in the
SVG Tiny 1.2 test suite
... and looked at the OMA ETR document
... I have drafted a message for the SVG Working Group
... on which Dom commented
... I'll update the message and send it to the SVG group in a
couple of hours
... as far as I understand, our future work depends on the
current state of coverage report from the SVG Working
Group
... if they have a complete coverage report or a complete set
of test assertions, we can understand what features requirement
from the OMA group has been tested
... if they don't (or only a high level report), we'll probably
need to do the coverage analysis ourselves
... in which case, we'll need quite a bit of resources to do
this
... I have a question, though: is the coverage report a
requirement for test suites for working groups?
Dom: no, it isn't
unfortunately
... I doubt the SVG group will have a detailed report
... W3C groups rarely have enough resources for this
Dmitri: in this case, what should we do? doing a full coverage report will require a lot of resources
Dom: one solution would be to
look at the SVG Tiny test suite, where I think the test cases
names give a rough indication of what features are tested
... and compare that list of features to what the OMA would
need
Dmitri: the OMA divided their test requirements by features too, so it may help us do the job
<scribe> ACTION: Dmitri to do a high-level coverage analysis of the SVG Tiny 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html#action01]
Dom: good work!
Dmitri: I'll send the message to SVG WG after this meeting
Carmelo: I contacted the the CSS
Working Group about CSS MP 2.0 test suite
... I'll come up with a plan to fill the gaps between the WCSS
and CSS MP, that I can present during the F2F
Dom: re XHTML MP test suite, I
sent a first corrected part of the test suite, based on the bug
report I sent a few weeks ago to the oMA
... hopefully they can integrate it in their test suite without
too much legal troubles
-> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/mwts-nist/ NIST test cases contributions
Carmelo: this is based on the
XHTML MP test suite, to complete some holes in the forms
module
... it isn't full coverage of the module, but it's already an
improvement
... please have a look at it, and send us feedback (or we can
look at that during the F2F)
Dom: thanks for the
contributions!
... I'll send feedback, have already a few comments to make
-> http://www.jwtmp.com/a/ mobile ACID test
dom: [introduces the concept of ACID2 test as emulation, and how it applies to mobile]
Wilhem: concepts sounds great;
the implementation needs some refinements
... will send details by email