IRC log of eo on 2007-09-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 11:51:00 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #eo
- 11:51:00 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc
- 11:51:12 [shawn]
- zakim ,this will be eowg
- 11:51:16 [shawn]
- zakim, this will be eowg
- 11:51:16 [Zakim]
- ok, shawn; I see WAI_EOWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 39 minutes
- 11:51:22 [shawn]
- chair: Shawn
- 11:52:09 [shawn]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0092.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html
- 11:52:25 [shawn]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html
- 11:52:37 [shawn]
- shawn has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JulSep/0096.html
- 12:17:15 [shawn]
- agenda+ Agenda review
- 12:17:24 [shawn]
- agenda+ Quick Reference: general
- 12:17:33 [shawn]
- agenda+ Quick Reference: Introduction
- 12:17:50 [shawn]
- agenda+ Quick Reference: customizing section
- 12:18:15 [shawn]
- agenda+ Quick Reference: conformance & other
- 12:18:29 [shawn]
- agenda+ Quick Reference: title
- 12:18:43 [shawn]
- agenda+ WAI-ARIA documents
- 12:25:21 [shadi]
- shadi has joined #eo
- 12:28:09 [shawn]
- agenda+ F2F meeting, hotel
- 12:29:10 [Zakim]
- WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has now started
- 12:29:11 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 12:29:33 [shawn]
- zakim, dial shawn-617
- 12:29:33 [Zakim]
- ok, shawn; the call is being made
- 12:29:34 [Zakim]
- +Shawn
- 12:29:46 [Harvey]
- Harvey has joined #eo
- 12:30:32 [Henny]
- Henny has joined #eo
- 12:31:29 [Zakim]
- + +020851aaaa
- 12:31:32 [judy]
- judy has joined #eo
- 12:31:49 [shadi]
- zakim, aaaa is really Henny
- 12:31:49 [Zakim]
- +Henny; got it
- 12:32:41 [Alan]
- Alan has joined #eo
- 12:33:24 [Wayne]
- Wayne has joined #eo
- 12:33:54 [Zakim]
- +doyle
- 12:34:04 [shadi]
- regrets: Andrew, Jack
- 12:34:12 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 12:34:28 [shadi]
- zakim, ? is really Sylvie
- 12:34:28 [Zakim]
- +Sylvie; got it
- 12:35:25 [shawn]
- zakim, who is here?
- 12:35:25 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny, doyle, Sylvie
- 12:35:26 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Wayne, Alan, judy, Henny, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn
- 12:35:27 [shadi]
- scribe: Shadi
- 12:35:33 [shadi]
- agenda?
- 12:35:50 [Zakim]
- +Wayne_Dick
- 12:35:54 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 12:35:58 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Agenda review" taken up [from shawn]
- 12:36:02 [Zakim]
- +??P10
- 12:36:11 [Alan]
- zakim, ??P10 is me
- 12:36:11 [Zakim]
- +Alan; got it
- 12:36:30 [shadi]
- slh: who had a look at the documents for reading?
- 12:36:34 [Sylvie]
- Sylvie has joined #eo
- 12:36:45 [Henny]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 12:36:45 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 12:36:59 [shadi]
- sd: quick reference, and sent comments
- 12:37:19 [shadi]
- wd: quick reference briefly, WAI-ARIA more closely
- 12:37:35 [shadi]
- ac: WAI-ARIA overwhelmed me
- 12:37:45 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 12:37:45 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 12:37:47 [Alan]
- zakim, who is making noise?
- 12:37:58 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 12:37:58 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Quick Reference: general" taken up [from shawn]
- 12:38:03 [Zakim]
- +[LC]
- 12:38:05 [Zakim]
- Alan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sylvie (6%), doyle (9%)
- 12:38:18 [shawn]
- zakim, [LC] is Justin
- 12:38:18 [Zakim]
- +Justin; got it
- 12:38:34 [Henny]
- zakim, unmute Henny
- 12:38:34 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 12:38:40 [shadi]
- ac: intimidating, lots of content
- 12:39:12 [shadi]
- slh: other first reactions?
- 12:39:25 [shadi]
- hs: agree with ac, lots of stuff there
- 12:39:35 [shadi]
- ...especially for recurring users
- 12:39:51 [shadi]
- ...maybe have a cover page for first-time users?
- 12:40:45 [shadi]
- wd: is the form functional? for example, selected scripting and it gave me everything
- 12:40:49 [Henny]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 12:40:49 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 12:41:48 [Liam]
- Liam has joined #eo
- 12:43:35 [shadi]
- wd: wasn't very helpful, gave me too much
- 12:43:51 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 12:43:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Quick Reference: Introduction" taken up [from shawn]
- 12:44:35 [Henny]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 12:44:35 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 12:44:39 [shadi]
- slh: most said this was long, where can we cut it down?
- 12:45:06 [shadi]
- ...issue with cover page is that some people may be directly pointed to this part
- 12:45:45 [shadi]
- hs: can select to hide introduction, not sure if people will find it
- 12:45:47 [Sylvie]
- no
- 12:46:04 [shadi]
- slh: who found that?
- 12:46:19 [shadi]
- [about 50% yes, 50% no]
- 12:46:45 [shadi]
- [agreement]
- 12:47:04 [shadi]
- jt: after i've read it, just hide
- 12:47:05 [Henny]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 12:47:05 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 12:47:56 [shadi]
- saz: not convinced that cover page wouldn't work, we can point there pretty clearly
- 12:48:10 [shadi]
- ...like on the tools list. but either options work for me
- 12:48:18 [Henny]
- zakim, unmute Henny
- 12:48:18 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 12:48:44 [shadi]
- slh: what are the pros and cons of having a separate cover page vs having the show/hide option?
- 12:48:53 [Zakim]
- +Liam_McGee
- 12:49:26 [shadi]
- ds: separate page makes it more readable to me, long text is opposite to a *quick* reference
- 12:49:51 [shadi]
- ...but something immediately clear that it can be customized works
- 12:50:07 [shadi]
- slh: do we need both show/hide and cover page?
- 12:50:16 [Henny]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 12:50:16 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 12:50:19 [shadi]
- wd: no, its too much
- 12:50:23 [shadi]
- [agreement]
- 12:50:53 [shadi]
- action: suggest the show/hide option around the heading of the introduction
- 12:51:49 [shadi]
- slh: any information that is not necessary?
- 12:54:00 [shadi]
- sd: first sentence should come later
- 12:54:11 [Harvey]
- Am unable to join by phone What is the proper phone number?
- 12:54:13 [shadi]
- slh: note that this will not stay there
- 12:54:37 [shadi]
- [agreement with sd]
- 12:55:47 [shadi]
- lmg: better to tell people what this resource is before pointing them to a different one
- 12:56:06 [shadi]
- slh: any reasons not to switch the first & second paragraphs?
- 12:56:27 [shadi]
- wd: not sure if it should be a paragraph
- 12:57:15 [shadi]
- action: suggest to switch first and second introduction paragraphs
- 12:57:54 [shadi]
- zakim, code?
- 12:57:54 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 3694 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), shadi
- 12:58:19 [Henny]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 12:58:19 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 12:59:08 [shadi]
- jt: not sure why that last paragraph is there, sounds more like a disclaimer
- 12:59:24 [shadi]
- hs: is more supplementary information, not for the user
- 12:59:33 [shadi]
- slh: not user-centric?
- 12:59:41 [shadi]
- [agreement]
- 13:00:01 [Henny]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 13:00:01 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 13:00:57 [shadi]
- jt: don't think rewording will help, it shouldn't be up there
- 13:01:02 [shadi]
- wd: it should go
- 13:02:42 [shadi]
- slh: important to know that techniques are not exhaustive, there are other ways to meet the success criteria
- 13:03:19 [shadi]
- wd: see people not able to understand these terms, rely on me to explain it
- 13:05:11 [shadi]
- lmg: can shorten several parts, much of the information is additional and not often needed
- 13:05:21 [Henny_]
- Henny_ has joined #eo
- 13:05:23 [shadi]
- ...for example sufficient techniques
- 13:05:32 [shadi]
- ...vs adivsory techniques
- 13:05:40 [shadi]
- q+
- 13:06:44 [shadi]
- saz: maybe additional information page?
- 13:06:53 [shadi]
- slh: will be such a page
- 13:07:21 [shadi]
- saz: if this information already exists already, why repeat it here?
- 13:07:24 [shadi]
- q-
- 13:08:17 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute Henny
- 13:08:17 [Zakim]
- Henny was already muted, Henny_
- 13:09:06 [shadi]
- wd: in my mind, "informative" is unecessary and i often ignore it
- 13:09:33 [shadi]
- slh: how does that term for people not heavily involved with standards?
- 13:09:44 [shadi]
- jt: doesn't tell me anything
- 13:09:44 [shawn]
- zakim, who is here?
- 13:09:44 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny (muted), doyle, Sylvie (muted), Wayne_Dick, Alan (muted), Justin, Liam_McGee
- 13:09:46 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Henny_, Liam, Sylvie, Wayne, Alan, judy, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn
- 13:10:03 [shadi]
- wd: should drop it
- 13:11:05 [shadi]
- lmg: information ... not required for conformance -maybe not something useful to say to everyone
- 13:11:17 [shadi]
- s/information/informative
- 13:11:49 [shawn]
- saz: usual developer not care normative, or informative
- 13:12:24 [Liam]
- Suggested minimum: This Quick Reference is based on the 17 May 2007 WCAG 2.0 draft. Anyone can submit new techniques to the Working Group at any time. For additional information on WCAG 2.0 and its supporting documents see Overview of WCAG 2.0 Documents.
- 13:12:24 [shadi]
- saz: usual developer not care normative, or informative
- 13:13:24 [shadi]
- action: suggest to only include the absolute minimum in the introduction, and move other information else where
- 13:13:30 [shadi]
- zakim, take up next
- 13:13:30 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Agenda review" taken up [from shawn]
- 13:13:48 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 13:13:48 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Quick Reference: Introduction" taken up [from shawn]
- 13:13:51 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 4
- 13:13:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Quick Reference: customizing section" taken up [from shawn]
- 13:14:19 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 1, 2, 3
- 13:14:19 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'close agendum 1, 2, 3', shadi
- 13:14:25 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 1
- 13:14:25 [Zakim]
- agendum 1, Agenda review, closed
- 13:14:27 [Zakim]
- I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 13:14:28 [Zakim]
- 2. Quick Reference: general [from shawn]
- 13:14:28 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 2
- 13:14:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 2, Quick Reference: general, closed
- 13:14:29 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 13:14:30 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 3
- 13:14:31 [Zakim]
- 4. Quick Reference: customizing section [from shawn]
- 13:14:32 [Zakim]
- agendum 3, Quick Reference: Introduction, closed
- 13:14:33 [Zakim]
- I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 13:14:34 [Zakim]
- 4. Quick Reference: customizing section [from shawn]
- 13:15:02 [shadi]
- slh: what is the benefit of the scripting version?
- 13:15:26 [shadi]
- ...see difference to without scripts
- 13:16:46 [Sylvie]
- q+ to comment on scripts
- 13:16:51 [shadi]
- jt: recurring submissions seems tedious
- 13:17:21 [shadi]
- lmg: changes after submissions are not clear
- 13:17:52 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute Henny
- 13:17:52 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 13:18:01 [shadi]
- slh: do people like the scripting?
- 13:18:05 [Alan]
- q+
- 13:18:13 [shadi]
- wd: doesn't really help
- 13:18:21 [shadi]
- jt: doesn't help me at all
- 13:19:19 [shadi]
- hs: relatively new paradigm of interface, not sure if people are already used to it
- 13:19:59 [shadi]
- ac: it is meant for experienced users, they can learn how to use this document
- 13:20:14 [shadi]
- ...customization is important
- 13:20:40 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute henny
- 13:20:40 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 13:20:48 [Alan]
- ack me
- 13:20:50 [shadi]
- slh: customization will be kept, the javascript is the question
- 13:21:24 [shadi]
- wd: scripting gets into the way of people who can't use scripting
- 13:22:01 [shadi]
- ...but not in this case
- 13:22:40 [shadi]
- slh: everyone gets the button regardless if scripting or not
- 13:23:27 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 13:23:27 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 13:23:53 [shadi]
- lmg: are we talking about the customization function or the submit button?
- 13:24:57 [shadi]
- slh: do people like the function of selecting a checkbox and having things showing/hiding without submitting?
- 13:25:04 [shadi]
- ack sylvie
- 13:25:04 [Zakim]
- Sylvie, you wanted to comment on scripts
- 13:25:28 [shadi]
- sd: depends on the users, designers and developers may like it
- 13:25:47 [shadi]
- ...but people with disabilities may be disturbed by it
- 13:26:24 [Liam]
- q+ to say that checking a checkbox should not prompt a page reload.
- 13:26:25 [shadi]
- ...maybe people will not understand why the page suddenly changes
- 13:26:43 [shadi]
- ...or why the button suddenly appears
- 13:27:07 [shadi]
- ...the text "save setting options" is not clear to me
- 13:28:04 [Liam]
- q+ to ask whether you can hide all three levels (A, AA and AAA).
- 13:28:19 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute henny
- 13:28:19 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 13:28:56 [Sylvie]
- zakim, mute Sylvie
- 13:28:56 [Zakim]
- Sylvie should now be muted
- 13:29:17 [Zakim]
- -Alan
- 13:30:08 [shadi]
- saz: like the overall function, the target audience is designers and developers (even if with disabilities)
- 13:30:26 [shadi]
- ...can improve a lot of the usability but the function helps
- 13:30:54 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 13:30:54 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 13:32:01 [Liam]
- q-
- 13:32:05 [Henny_]
- queue/ henny
- 13:32:13 [shadi]
- jt: not aparent that my actions had any effects, don't know what changed
- 13:33:57 [shadi]
- lmg: script can either submit the page which would cause a reload, or to show/hide which gives no clues on the changes
- 13:34:24 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute henny
- 13:34:24 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 13:34:27 [shadi]
- hs: if one gets a message notification it may help
- 13:36:26 [shadi]
- slh: issue if a lot of things are unselected, then anchors don't work well
- 13:37:01 [shadi]
- saz: how did the usability tests with designers/developers work?
- 13:37:33 [shadi]
- slh: can't remember
- 13:37:59 [shadi]
- wd: really can't detect the differences when changes are made
- 13:40:27 [shadi]
- jt: correlation between SC 1.1.1 and CSS may not be clear to everyone
- 13:40:41 [shadi]
- saz: not the scripting issue
- 13:40:52 [shadi]
- slh: relates to wd's observation
- 13:41:36 [shadi]
- action: raise bug that when CSS is not selected, still get CSS advisory techniques
- 13:45:33 [shadi]
- wd: push out everything on you in case you might miss something but in turn it hides what you need to find
- 13:46:42 [Wayne]
- A person with blindness or low vision has no programatic way to find the essential search items.
- 13:47:20 [shawn]
- saz: focusing on CSS, versus evaluating a page that includes CSS
- 13:47:46 [shawn]
- saz: perhaps additional options for different use case
- 13:49:00 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 13:50:00 [Zakim]
- -Wayne_Dick
- 13:50:14 [shawn]
- agenda?
- 13:51:27 [shadi]
- lmg: having thoughts about turning on/off
- 13:51:39 [shadi]
- ...the semantics don't seem to work
- 13:52:49 [shadi]
- lmg: turning sections on/off is not consistent, for example can't turn off the TOC
- 13:53:23 [judy]
- q+
- 13:53:30 [shadi]
- ...can turn off A, AA, and AAA -don't see why this is useful
- 13:53:34 [shadi]
- ack j
- 13:54:21 [shadi]
- jb: rationale was so that one could see the most basic requirements -the guidelines
- 13:55:49 [shadi]
- lmg: why are techniques and failures together?
- 13:56:06 [shadi]
- slh: because WG thinks that it is important
- 13:56:20 [shadi]
- lmg: what if someone wants to see the failures alone?
- 13:56:33 [shadi]
- slh: relates back to wd's point, need to rediscuss
- 13:57:06 [shadi]
- lmg: should automatically save settings
- 13:57:09 [judy]
- q+
- 13:57:33 [judy]
- q+ to say that the setting changes should be an option, because i might want to do something different the next time i use it.
- 13:58:17 [shadi]
- slh: what happens when you go away and come back later?
- 13:58:37 [shadi]
- saz: can be notified that settings are preset
- 13:58:40 [shadi]
- ack j
- 13:58:40 [Zakim]
- judy, you wanted to say that the setting changes should be an option, because i might want to do something different the next time i use it.
- 13:58:42 [judy]
- q-
- 13:59:41 [shadi]
- saz: i hear cookies and privacy concerns...
- 13:59:42 [judy]
- zakim, who's here?
- 13:59:42 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shadi, Shawn, Henny (muted), doyle, Sylvie (muted), Justin, Liam_McGee, Judy
- 13:59:44 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Henny_, Liam, Sylvie, judy, Harvey, shadi, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn
- 14:02:03 [shadi]
- lmg: have an issue with the labeling -in forms mode screen reader users often tend to miss headers
- 14:02:26 [shadi]
- ...prefer to have slightly longer labels like "show CSS" etc
- 14:02:57 [shadi]
- ...add verbs like "show" to have a better construction
- 14:03:44 [shadi]
- ...take out the labels on the fieldsets
- 14:06:29 [shadi]
- sd: notes will be missed unless read line-by-line
- 14:07:58 [shadi]
- action: in the customizing section, add a disabled checkbox with the HTML that is always selected (as opposed to the note)
- 14:09:36 [Sylvie]
- zakim, mute sylvie
- 14:09:36 [Zakim]
- Sylvie should now be muted
- 14:11:35 [shadi]
- lmg: suggest to remove the notification in the red brackets
- 14:12:01 [shadi]
- ...suggest to notify through the heading and the title
- 14:12:32 [shadi]
- slh: issue is how to communicate once a customization is made
- 14:13:30 [Zakim]
- +Bingham
- 14:15:26 [shadi]
- saz: understood lmg saying take out legends for the fieldsets but therefore have more elaborate labels for the individual controls
- 14:16:41 [shawn]
- agenda?
- 14:16:53 [shadi]
- zakim, close agendum 4
- 14:16:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 4, Quick Reference: customizing section, closed
- 14:16:54 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 14:16:55 [Zakim]
- 5. Quick Reference: conformance & other [from shawn]
- 14:17:04 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 5
- 14:17:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "Quick Reference: conformance & other" taken up [from shawn]
- 14:17:10 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 14:17:10 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 14:17:33 [shadi]
- slh: who realized that at the bottom were conformance requirements?
- 14:17:41 [shadi]
- [1 yes, 2 no]
- 14:18:09 [shadi]
- lmg: kind of a prize for the ones who read all the way to the end
- 14:18:14 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute henny
- 14:18:14 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 14:18:41 [Sylvie]
- zakim, unmute sylvie
- 14:18:41 [Zakim]
- Sylvie should no longer be muted
- 14:19:53 [shadi]
- lmg: it's there just in case you may need it
- 14:19:54 [shadi]
- jt: doesn't fit with the quick reference
- 14:20:22 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 14:20:22 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 14:20:29 [shadi]
- sd: maybe a page navigation (like on the other WAI pages) listing the <h2>s
- 14:21:07 [shadi]
- lmg: move the table of contents as a page navigation?
- 14:21:21 [Henny_]
- zakim, mute henny
- 14:21:21 [Zakim]
- Henny should now be muted
- 14:21:35 [shadi]
- sd: no, TOC is too long, a brief overview
- 14:21:36 [Sylvie]
- zakim, mute Sylvie
- 14:21:36 [Zakim]
- Sylvie should now be muted
- 14:22:55 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 8
- 14:22:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 8. "F2F meeting, hotel" taken up [from shawn]
- 14:23:09 [shadi]
- slh: very busy time of the year in boston
- 14:23:37 [shadi]
- ...if you are planning to stay at the conference hotel, please make your reservations soon
- 14:23:44 [shadi]
- ...preferably today
- 14:24:26 [shadi]
- Topic: new Chair
- 14:24:49 [shadi]
- jb: i'm stepping down from my role as EOWG chair to focus on other WAI work
- 14:25:06 [shadi]
- ...especially on WAI-AGE and other standard harmonization work
- 14:25:20 [shadi]
- ...slh will be the new chair
- 14:26:03 [shadi]
- ...the work in this group is really important to me, think it is vital
- 14:26:19 [shadi]
- ...will continue to participate, but no longer as chair
- 14:26:58 [shadi]
- ...it was an honor to chair the group, hoping you will continue to support Shawn
- 14:27:23 [shadi]
- ...really important work being used by people all around the world
- 14:27:42 [shadi]
- ds: big hug, will miss you being around all the time
- 14:27:45 [Henny_]
- zakim, unmute henny
- 14:27:45 [Zakim]
- Henny should no longer be muted
- 14:27:58 [shadi]
- ...your heart had been in this
- 14:30:06 [Zakim]
- -doyle
- 14:30:07 [Zakim]
- -Justin
- 14:30:08 [Zakim]
- -Henny
- 14:30:10 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 14:30:11 [Zakim]
- -Sylvie
- 14:30:12 [Zakim]
- -Liam_McGee
- 14:30:16 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 14:31:21 [Liam]
- Liam has left #eo
- 14:37:02 [Zakim]
- -Bingham
- 14:37:04 [Zakim]
- -Shawn
- 14:37:06 [Zakim]
- WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended
- 14:37:07 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Shadi, Shawn, +020851aaaa, Henny, doyle, Sylvie, Wayne_Dick, Alan, Justin, Liam_McGee, Judy, Bingham
- 14:56:57 [shadi]
- zakim, bye
- 14:56:58 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #eo
- 14:57:06 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:57:12 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:57:12 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-minutes.html shadi
- 14:57:13 [shadi]
- rrsagent, make logs world
- 14:57:17 [shadi]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-actions.rdf :
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: suggest the show/hide option around the heading of the introduction [1]
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T12-50-53
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: suggest to switch first and second introduction paragraphs [2]
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T12-57-15
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: suggest to only include the absolute minimum in the introduction, and move other information else where [3]
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T13-13-24
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: raise bug that when CSS is not selected, still get CSS advisory techniques [4]
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T13-41-36
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: in the customizing section, add a disabled checkbox with the HTML that is always selected (as opposed to the note) [5]
- 14:57:17 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/21-eo-irc#T14-07-58