13:54:58 RRSAgent has joined #forms 13:54:58 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/29-forms-irc 13:55:06 Zakim has joined #forms 13:57:31 rrsagent, make log public 13:57:44 Meeting: Forms WG Weekly Teleconference 13:58:21 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Aug/0082 13:58:28 Steven has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Aug/0082 14:01:45 markbirbeck has joined #forms 14:53:07 MarkS has joined #forms 14:54:57 jturner has joined #forms 14:56:08 wellsk has joined #forms 14:58:20 zakim, who is here? 14:58:22 sorry, wellsk, I don't know what conference this is 14:58:25 On IRC I see wellsk, jturner, MarkS, markbirbeck, Zakim, RRSAgent, Steven, trackbot-ng 14:58:38 zakim, this will be forms 14:58:39 ok, Steven, I see HTML_Forms()11:00AM already started 14:58:44 zakim, who is here? 14:58:45 On the phone I see wellsk 14:58:45 zakim, code? 14:58:49 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck 14:58:53 On IRC I see wellsk, jturner, MarkS, markbirbeck, Zakim, RRSAgent, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:00:55 +??P5 15:01:11 zakim, dial steven-617 15:01:11 ok, Steven; the call is being made 15:01:13 +Steven 15:01:15 Nick has joined #Forms 15:01:24 zakim, code? 15:01:24 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Nick 15:01:25 zakim, who is here? 15:01:26 On the phone I see wellsk, ??P5, Steven 15:01:27 On IRC I see Nick, wellsk, jturner, MarkS, markbirbeck, Zakim, RRSAgent, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:01:39 +[IBM] 15:01:44 lars has joined #forms 15:01:48 zakim, ??p5 is MarkS 15:01:48 +MarkS; got it 15:02:15 +Nick_van_den_Bleeken 15:02:24 zakim, mute me 15:02:24 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:02:30 zakim, who is noisy? 15:02:44 Steven, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 5 (5%) 15:02:56 I thought it was tap dancing 15:03:03 zakim, mute wellsk briefly 15:03:04 I don't understand 'mute wellsk briefly', Steven 15:03:24 klotz has joined #forms 15:03:31 sorry 15:03:34 :-) 15:03:55 Charlie has joined #forms 15:04:01 ebruchez has joined #forms 15:04:07 +??P10 15:04:15 zakim, who is here? 15:04:15 On the phone I see wellsk, MarkS, Steven, [IBM], Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), ??P10 15:04:17 On IRC I see ebruchez, Charlie, klotz, lars, Nick, wellsk, jturner, MarkS, markbirbeck, Zakim, RRSAgent, Steven, trackbot-ng 15:04:21 zakim, [IBM] is Charlie 15:04:21 +Charlie; got it 15:04:24 zakim, i am ? 15:04:24 +markbirbeck; got it 15:04:29 +Leigh_Klotz 15:04:45 +??P28 15:04:49 + +9308322aaaa 15:05:02 zakim, ??P28 is ebruchez 15:05:05 zakim, aaaa is me 15:05:05 +ebruchez; got it 15:05:06 +jturner; got it 15:05:51 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:05:51 On the phone I see wellsk, MarkS, Steven, Charlie, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), markbirbeck, Leigh_Klotz, ebruchez, jturner 15:06:02 zakim, mute me 15:06:12 jturner should now be muted 15:06:21 <_lars> _lars has joined #forms 15:08:34 <_lars> hm, zakim isn't working very well for me today... I'll try another number 15:08:41 <_lars> zakim, code? 15:08:41 the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), _lars 15:09:42 * yes, could i suggest one based on the IBM approved list? 15:09:49 * i can send email in a bit 15:11:45 zakim, mute me 15:11:45 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:12:21 +??P3 15:12:33 <_lars> zakim, lars is ??P3 15:12:33 sorry, _lars, I do not recognize a party named 'lars' 15:12:37 <_lars> zakim, _lars is ??P3 15:12:37 sorry, _lars, I do not recognize a party named '_lars' 15:12:48 <_lars> zakim, ??P3 is _lars 15:12:48 +_lars; got it 15:13:01 <_lars> zakim, mute me please 15:13:01 _lars should now be muted 15:13:51 Blake has joined #forms 15:13:55 don't know if it related but david posted some remarks to the test suite 15:14:10 (on www-forms) 15:14:41 + +1.541.754.aabb 15:14:59 zakim, aabb is Blake 15:14:59 +Blake; got it 15:15:57 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Test/XForms1.0/Edition3/front_html/XF103edTestSuite.html 15:17:43 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/XPath?id=12;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:20:51 no time 15:21:23 a date not without time 15:21:29 2002-09-24+06:00 15:21:36 I think ;) 15:21:54 so a date with time zone 15:22:07 now: data + time + time zone 15:22:33 ack me 15:24:10 I'll ask David 15:25:01 there is an example for local-time 15:25:29 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/MIPs?id=102;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:25:52 zakim, mute me 15:25:52 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:27:26 on the previous discussion...surely now() *doesn't* return the 'local time', since it is first normalised to UTC. So if it's 1pm in somewhere that is 8 hours behind London, won't now() give 21:00? 15:29:13 I think it should be in the default stylesheet we talked about 15:29:33 don't know in which state the default css is? 15:30:13 ack me 15:31:21 zakim, mute me 15:31:21 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:32:44 ack me 15:35:48 zakim, mute me 15:35:48 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:38:20 it does have an effect 15:38:36 I think you want to style invalid values 15:38:55 just like you want to style required by default 15:39:47 ack me 15:51:26 zakim, mute me 15:51:26 Nick_van_den_Bleeken should now be muted 15:51:37 http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Events?id=29;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1 15:52:00 ack me 15:52:27 is this the resolution: required and invalid fields should be presented specially, and form authors should have control over presentation and processors may vary the presentation style and time and processors should use CSS if it is available. 15:52:52 looks good 15:54:11 ack me 15:54:42 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xforms11-20070222/#rpm-init 15:54:49 Perform the behaviors of xforms-rebuild, xforms-recalculate, and xforms-revalidate in sequence on this model element without dispatching events to invoke the behaviors. 15:55:27 The notification event markings for these operations are discarded, and the xforms-refresh behavior is not performed since the user interface has not yet been initialized. 15:57:19 -Leigh_Klotz 15:57:36 phone died 15:57:56 darn 15:58:52 Mark: I agree that it is odd that the CSS treatment and the event treatment happen differently 15:59:07 ... it used to be different to this 15:59:18 it wont letme join 15:59:18 Erik: We optimise this case 15:59:42 ... but if you have 400 controls, there will be quite a lot of events 16:00:11 Mark: We want to do save and resume, and so we need the initialization events 16:00:39 ... so I agree strongly with you , and we should reinstate this (I hadn't realised it was gone) 16:01:00 Nick: I think it was an erratum on 1.0 16:01:10 i have posted a use case for xforms-value-changed on instance replace, to handle "errors" dpeending on the returned instance. 16:01:10 Mark: I think it is a side-effect of the change to refresh 16:01:54 MIP events but not value-changed, yes 16:02:23 Mark: We can't resolve this now. Need John to tell us whether it was changed by mistake 16:02:36 ... let's put this off to the FtF 16:02:45 bye 16:02:45 -wellsk 16:02:46 <_lars> bye 16:02:46 -ebruchez 16:02:47 -Steven 16:02:48 Blake has left #forms 16:02:48 Steven: So resolved 16:02:48 -markbirbeck 16:02:49 bye 16:02:50 -Blake 16:02:52 -MarkS 16:02:55 -Nick_van_den_Bleeken 16:02:56 wellsk has left #forms 16:02:57 -Charlie 16:02:59 -jturner 16:03:03 -_lars 16:03:05 HTML_Forms()11:00AM has ended 16:03:07 Attendees were wellsk, Steven, MarkS, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Charlie, markbirbeck, Leigh_Klotz, +9308322aaaa, ebruchez, jturner, _lars, +1.541.754.aabb, Blake 16:03:10 MarkS has left #forms 16:03:13 rrsagent, make minutes 16:03:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/08/29-forms-minutes.html Steven 16:03:31 Leigh, I hope you can use my notes to finish off the minutes 16:03:57 already done thank you. phone battery fell out adn wehn i put it abck in zakim said no 16:04:06 :-S 16:04:24 leigh? 16:04:29 yes Nick 16:04:41 can you add this to the minutes http://www.w3.org/2006/03/REC-xforms-20060314-errata.html#E29a 16:04:50 where? 16:04:51 29.1 Amend Default Processing of xforms-model-constr 16:05:06 in the last issue? 16:05:12 it is the erate that removed the sending of the events on construction 16:05:16 ok 16:05:17 yes 16:05:50 I'll send an e-mail to the mailing list also, but when we read the minutes again it is handy that's there 16:21:11 Nick has joined #Forms 17:56:35 Zakim has left #forms