19:53:48 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:53:48 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/23-au-irc 19:54:03 zakim, this will be AUWG 19:54:03 ok, JR; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start 54 minutes ago 19:54:13 Meeting: WAI AU 19:54:46 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0007.html 19:54:56 Scribe: JR 19:59:51 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 19:59:58 +??P0 20:00:11 Zakim, ??P0 is really JR 20:00:11 +JR; got it 20:00:35 +[IBM] 20:01:25 zakim, [IBM] is rally BarryF 20:01:25 I don't understand '[IBM] is rally BarryF', JR 20:01:31 zakim, [IBM] is really BarryF 20:01:31 +BarryF; got it 20:02:42 +Greg_Pisocky 20:07:23 Greg has joined #au 20:07:46 Hi can you see this? 20:08:07 I had trouble getting on last week 20:17:36 +Tim_Boland 20:17:51 Hi Tim 20:23:57 All: Group discussion of AJAX toolkits... 20:25:19 All: Example of Google toolkit, very powerful, uses Java to instruct the production of Javascript 20:26:42 Regrets: Jutta Treviranus 20:26:49 Topic: 1. Authoring tools in TEITAC issue 20:27:26 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0004.html 20:27:36 BF: Do we as a group want to do anything on this. 20:28:37 http://teitac.org/wiki/Web_and_Software 20:28:48 BF: It's a small subet of ATAG2 20:29:36 BF: Is that ok with us? 20:29:47 GP: It's a procurement regulation 20:30:17 GP: Incorporating all of ATAG is problemeatic because procurement wouldn;t happen 20:30:30 GP: Government neeeds measurable standards 20:30:45 GP: That can be applied in timely manner 20:31:10 BF: So you've just got to meet those 4 things? 20:31:54 BF: Plus a bunch of other general purpose things - documentation, display, etc 20:32:09 correction, that was GP 20:32:25 BF: Whay would anyone follow ATAG then? 20:33:01 BF: Just questionning why anyone would look at ATAG if 508 was different? 20:34:14 GP: 508 is really broad 20:36:32 JR: 508 is updated every so often and we can ensure ATAG2 is the best model of an authoring tool standard 20:36:45 GP: There are a variety of other ways to get involved. 20:38:54 GP: Competitive process - evaluating accessibility, functional reqs, price 20:39:32 Topic: 2. Defining Content Type/Technology 20:40:23 TECHNOLOGY, Web Content 20:40:23 A mechanism for encoding instructions to be rendered or executed by user agents. Technologies may include markup languages, data formats, or programming languages that authors may use alone or in combination to create end-user experiences that range from static Web pages to dynamic Web applications. Some common examples of Web content technologies include HTML, CSS, SVG, PNG, PDF, Flash, and JavaScript. 20:43:18 All: Generally ok, but will look it over and send any comments to the list. 20:43:31 3. ATAG 2.0 Development 20:46:53 Topic: BF's action item 20:46:58 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0008.html 20:49:20 GP: Would add "panels" 20:50:03 GP: And keep "dialogs" 20:50:28 GP: All those docking things 20:55:17 Isn't the correct term docking thingies? :-) 21:01:09 -Tim_Boland 21:01:13 -BarryF 21:01:15 -Greg_Pisocky 21:01:29 Next meeting July 30 21:01:56 -JR 21:01:57 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has ended 21:01:58 Attendees were JR, BarryF, Greg_Pisocky, Tim_Boland 21:02:10 RRSAgent, make minutes 21:02:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/23-au-minutes.html JR 21:02:21 RRSAgent, set logs public 21:02:30 Zakim, bye 21:02:30 Zakim has left #au 21:02:36 RRSAgent, bye 21:02:36 I see no action items