See also: IRC log
SAZ: we can skip de-briefing (topic 1)
... I created new draft for EARL schema, sent to list
JK: I could probably send new draft for HTTP-in-RDF draft by tomorrow
SAZ: March 14th: formal decision for publishing
EARL last call
... publishing could then be about a week after
... publish new HTTP-in-RDF draft together with EARL last call
... would be great to also publish a first public draft for Pointers
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20070226
SAZ: bottom of section 1.1 new note about security/privacy issues
<shadi> CI: tone of the message is quite negative, try to rephrase more positively
<shadi> ACTION: saz revise the note on security/privacy to be more positive [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/28-er-minutes.html#action01]
<shadi> CI: missing something about trust. did not discuss it but may reference some other work like POWDER
<shadi> SAZ: security & privacy also outside the scope of EARL
<shadi> CI: security & privacy is an issue of EARL reports, trust is different
<shadi> JK: can leave it out or put it in if someone asks for it
<shadi> SAZ: what about the position in the document? its a bit hidden
<shadi> CI: yes, hidden. maybe before the examples? don't know exactly where
<shadi> SAZ: section 1.3 seems to me like a bit of a repitition to "audience" sub-section of 1.2
<shadi> SAZ: earl:mode has now an "at most = 1" restriction
<shadi> SAZ: using rdf:about rather than rdf:ID to avoid confusion
<shadi> SAZ: split section 2.2 into 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 to make it easier to read
<shadi> SAZ: example 7 reflects what we had decided at the f2f, would like feedback
<shadi> SAZ: section 2.8 more or less completely rewritten, please look at it closely
<shadi> ACTION: saz fix example 12 (missing slash for earl:context) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/28-er-minutes.html#action02]
<shadi> ACTION: saz fix numbering (section4 should be 3) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/28-er-minutes.html#action03]
<shadi> SAZ: updated terms tables
<shadi> ...in "classes" added "suggested types" together with "allowable types"
<shadi> ...in properties added "restrictions"
<shadi> ...in "Values" added "description"
<shadi> SAZ: also updated history section
<shadi> CI: do we need to keep all the previous changes or only to the last WD?
<shadi> ACTION: saz take out the changes prior to the previous WD [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/28-er-minutes.html#action04]
<shadi> SAZ: also need to check how this draft is in-line with our requirements document
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Requirements/
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/PTRS/
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers/
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers-in-RDF/
<shadi> JK: Pointers or Pointer-in-RDF
<shadi> CI: Pointers
<shadi> RESOLUTION: go for "Pointers" (unless overlap with other work)