SWD WG -- 16 Jan 2007

Admin

Guus: The agenda is on the wiki for the F2F
... Monday night is meeting with Semantic Web group.
... everyone is invited

[Guus is muted because of bad Skype connection. Tom continues as telecon chair.]

RESOLVED: Minutes of previous telecon: 2007-01-09 http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-swd-minutes.html accepted.

<scribe> ACTION: [CONTINUED] TomB and Guus to look at proposal for assigning scribe duties [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-swd-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUED]

Tom: Face-to-face organizational issues
... Everyone should be registered for the F2F meeting See http://www.w3.org/2007/01/MGMoverview.html

Face-to-face agenda: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Agenda20060122

Logistics: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0031.html

<guus> we have now 10 ftf participants plus four observers

ACTION: [DONE] Everyone should be registered for the F2F by 10 Jan [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/19-swd-minutes.html#action02]

SKOS REQUIREMENTS

URIs for Issues: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0025.html

Antoine: We have started the addition of use cases
... Edited use cases on wiki is growing. There is both a summary and detailed versions.
... the summary will go into the edited use case document if the detail is appropriate.
... We have produced something that keeps the key details

<Antoine> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/EditedUCs

Antoine: half of our use cases have been edited.
...reading the edited use cases is good preparation.
...I can gather them into an html doc so people can read the summaries.

daniel: different terminologies have different needs ...
critical information to gather, some people have put it into use cases, some havent' ...
don't know if we want to go to that level of detail for meeting?

<guus> yes, very relevant: this kind of provenance req

ACTION: Antoine to post note to list describing how members of WG should prepare for the F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-swd-minutes.html#action03]

<Zakim> aliman, you wanted to ask about issue URI resolution and to mention some thoughts on use cases

ACTION: Daniel to state problem with suggestion of where to look in preparing for this discussion of collecting metadata requriements. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-swd-minutes.html#action04]

Alistair: We need to analyze the work going on to understand how SKOS fits in
...Then there would be another level of detail in which we determine how to represent vocabularies.
Alistair: The questionnaire was written to gather understanding of the work as well as get the level
dlrubin: some people aren't providing that level of detail.
Alistair: we may need to go back to the communities
...I'm not sure the level of detail to focus on at the meeting
Tom: we need to have guidance for a strategy for reading the material

dlrubin: two-tiered approach
<guus> but we should also start listing reqs
dlrubin: I suggest the F2F reviewing the application areas first and then summarizing the missing detail
Alistair: would be good idea to review the applications in context before going into detail

Antoine has started a req list on http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/CandidateReqList
<guus> brainstorm session on reqs at ftf, with rough thoughts as input ?!
Guus: If the editors have the initial list, we can bootstrap the session with these thoughts at the F2F
...would be useful if have initial list, to work from that
Antoine: I can produce links to the UCs
Alistair: I'll roll out the new SKOS website later this week

RDF in XHTML

[CONTINUE] ACTION: guus to review RDFa documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-swd-minutes.html#action08]

[CONTINUE] ACTION: guus/tomb to put item on f2f agenda to make publication decision for RDFa documents (use cases and primer) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-swd-minutes.html#action09]

ACTION: [DONE] guus/tomb to put item on f2f agenda to make publication decision for RDFa documents (use cases and primer) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/05-swd-minutes.html#action09]

[CONTINUE] ACTION: Daniel will review RDFa. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-swd-minutes.html#action08]

Pointers in Ben's message: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0015.html

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/20070109/

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20070104/Overview.html