See also: IRC log
<scribe> ACTION: ACTION: Felix to go back to XML Schema people with WG reply on IRI test (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: ACTION: Felix to prepare a text of a blog entry about the IRI / IDN issue in the alverstrand draft and send it Richard (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: Michael to propose an update to the section in the IRI - IDN draft "does it work?" about domain names, see what needs to be sad these days (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
Francois: I did get the mail on the list
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to add the alverstrand draft to the IRI / IDN article (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: all to give feedback on LTLI update (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to write a mail about possibility for SVG tiny specific IRI tests to martin and the i18n core list (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to have a look at issue 3698 and gather information on options for diacrictics in collations (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to find out what is the canonical URI for BCP47 (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
Richard: we need to tell PLS to use the RFC editor URI
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to go back to the CSS WG saying that we did not come to do the CSS 2.1 review and need an extension until 16 Februrary [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action10]
Richard: there have been
discussions related to the bidi override. Should we say we want
that fixed within CSS 2.1?
... there is still more discussion tbd
Felix: I send a mail to the WG asking for an extension until 16 Februrary
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to send a mail about our Bidi comment on CSS 2.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Jan/0003.html
Richard: I agree with everything, except the BCP 47 reference, which I mentioned in the 0003 mail
Francois: agree
RESOLUTION: WG agrees with the position of Richard on PLS comments in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Jan/0003.html
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to go back to PLS folks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to go back to WS policy and say i18n core is fine with the pocliy drafts [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action13]
<fyergeau> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Dec/0014.html
(Francois describes the XML Core position)
Richard: XML core plans to use the XLink reference in all XML related specs?
Francois: yes
... need to reread Martins mail carefully
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to reread Martins mail and to write a reply to him [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action14]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to go back to xml schema saying we will have IRI xml schema tests as part of the IRI test suite, no need to have them within the xml schema conformance test suite [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action15]
<scribe> postponed
<scribe> ACTION: all to look at the C064 issue, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Dec/0028.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action16]
<scribe> done already
various people subscribed, but have not followed the discussion in detail
Michael: would be good to read
the mails
... looked at some before the holidays
... there was no agreement on topics like script mixing
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to describe potential data binding review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/09-i18ncore-minutes.html#action17]
Francois: no call next week (Richard and Felix on travel), call in two weeks (Regrets from Richard)