ISSUE-119 - Public View
Should lengthComputable and total have names that start the same
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Progress Event
- Raised by:
- Anne van Kesteren
- Opened on:
- 2007-07-31
- Description:
Anne suggests [1] that we make lengthComutable and total align their names to $foo and $foo$computable. Is there any reason not to consider this as a purely editorial issue? Did they already get implemented with these names somewhere? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2007Jul/0048.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-119: Should lengthComputable and total have names that start the same (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-07-31)
- ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-10-28)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-11-05)
- Comparing Progress events with other specs... (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-11-19)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@Sun.COM on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names lengthComputable and total (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-12-10)
- Re: ISSUE-119: names length Computable and total (from Andrew.Sledd@ikivo.com on 2007-12-17)
Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.
Related notes:
2008-02-22: Closed by not accepting Anne's suggestion, since it is already implemented in other places with the names in the current draft.