ISSUE-145
Last Call Comment: property chains
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Alistair Miles
- Opened on:
- 2008-09-30
- Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: """ In the case that you are going to change the spec to /allow/ such chains (it's an "At Risk" feature): Consider talking about "/Sub/ Property Chains". At least all given examples are of this kind. This would allow to express such semantic conditions in OWL 2. (I think it's not very realistic that general property chains will be part of a future version of OWL.) """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
- Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
- Re: ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: We propose to amend the SKOS Reference with wording following your suggestion.
2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None