12:57:22 RRSAgent has joined #htmltf
12:57:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/05/15-htmltf-irc
12:59:36 Meeting: RDF-in-XHTML TF
13:00:09 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006May/0013.html
13:00:30 benadida has joined #htmltf
13:00:31 RalphS has changed the topic to: HTML TF Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006May/0013.html
13:00:39 Chair: Ben
13:00:47 rrsagent, please make record public
13:01:06 Previous: 2006-05-08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006May/0005
13:01:21 SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has now started
13:01:28 +Ralph
13:01:30 +Ben_Adida
13:06:01 Steven has joined #htmltf
13:06:14 zakim, dial steven-617
13:06:14 ok, Steven; the call is being made
13:06:16 +Steven
13:09:54 +??P6
13:10:10 zakim, ??p6 is Mark
13:10:10 +Mark; got it
13:10:18 MarkB_ has joined #htmltf
13:10:40 agenda+ Action Item Revidw
13:10:46 agenda+ Upcoming presentations
13:10:58 agenda+ CLASS v. ROLE
13:12:09 next agendum
13:12:14 zakim, take up agendum 1
13:12:14 agendum 1. "Action Item Revidw" taken up [from RalphS]
13:12:26 [DONE] ACTION: Ben update hGRDDL issue to note a possible requirement for explicit pipelining in GRDDL [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-htmltf-minutes.html#action07]
13:12:43 Had network problems over the w/e so didn't get round to posting link to my presentation for XTech 2006. However, here it is: http://skimstone.x-port.net/node/289
13:12:51 ACTION: Ben write a prototype hGRDDL profile for XHTML 1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/08-htmltf-minutes.html#action06]
13:12:53 -- continues
13:12:53 Will also send to list.
13:13:14 Ben: have some related email Laurian Gridinoc
13:13:29 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006May/0014.html Re: Proposal: hGRDDL, an extraction from Microformats to RDFa [Laurian Gridinoc]
13:13:57 Ben: transformation rules will be ok but quoting will present a challenge
13:14:07 ACTION: Ben start separate mail threads on remaining discussion topics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/12/06-swbp-minutes#action04]
13:14:09 -- continues
13:14:12 Ben: making progress
13:14:18 ACTION: Ben to draft full response to Bjoern's 2004 email [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/01/24-swbp-minutes.html#action03]
13:14:20 -- continues
13:14:38 Ben: I do have all the feedback I need
13:14:41 ACTION: Ben, Mark be ready on 15 May to discuss WWW2006 presentations [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/01-htmltf-minutes.html#action04]
13:14:44 -- done
13:15:17 [DONE] ACTION: Ben, Mark send outlines of their XTech and WWW2006 presentations this week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/01-htmltf-minutes.html#action05]
13:15:32 ACTION: once Steven sends editors' draft of XHTML2, all TF members take a look and comment on showstopper issues only [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/02/06-htmltf-minutes.html#action01]
13:15:36 -- continues
13:15:55 Steven: I give a presentation tomorrow
13:16:05 ... saw no comments on my draft, so I assume everyone is OK
13:16:56 (pointer to Steven's slides near http://www.w3.org/2006/05/01-htmltf-minutes.html#action05 )
13:17:11 11 slides starting http://www.w3.org/2006/Talks/05-16-Steven-XHTML2-XForms/#metadata
13:18:02 take up next agendum
13:18:07 zakim, take up agendum 2
13:18:07 agendum 2. "Upcoming presentations" taken up [from RalphS]
13:20:46 Mark: the point I would like to stress is that RDFa makes a lot of information available to _browsers_
13:20:58 ... improves the user experience by enhancing the UI using the metadata
13:22:00 -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006May/0017.html ACTION: MB to post link to his XTech 2006 presentation on RDFa [Mark]
13:22:26 -> http://skimstone.x-port.net/node/289 RDFa: The easy way to publish your metadata
13:24:09 Mark: how many presenters?
13:24:45 Ben: you can use my slides but as you are listed as the presenter, there's no need for me to be on the podium
13:25:02 Ralph: I think the presentation would come across better if there is only one person on the podium
13:26:35 Ben: for W3C track I plan to show demos but not delve into the code
13:26:47 ... for Developer's Track I may get into looking at the code
13:26:54 Ralph: sounds right
13:29:46 Mark: the presentation in node/289 is meant to be given this Thursday
13:30:12 [there's especially good stuff in http://skimstone.x-port.net/node/266 ]
13:33:04 [Steven, re: your slide "RDF Terminology" - while it's true that the term "triple" is in common usage today, the formal RDF term is "Statement". Indeed, rdf:Statement is a specified rdfs:Class. I argued for "assertion" but lost. "statement" is at least better than "triple".]
13:33:25 [thanks]
13:34:27 [If you do add the term "statement", it's probably good to leave a parenthetic remark about "triple"]
13:35:36 +31624671668
13:36:34 Ben: Mark is taking the lead on developing the story for the "Next Wave" session
13:36:46 ... I am developing the story for the W3C Track
13:37:36 [/me wishes he were going to be present to hear all these great presentations]
13:37:59 Ben: recommend putting copies of all materials on W3C site as well as local laptops
13:38:16 ACTION: Ben make sure RDFA bookmarklet runs locally
13:38:53 Topic: hGRDDL profiles
13:40:05 Ben: PROPOSE to resolve that hGRDDL plus explicit default profiles for XHTML1 and XHTML2 are going to be the direction pursued by this TF
13:40:30 s/the direction/a direction/
13:40:46 so RESOLVED
13:45:47 rel="next"
13:46:10 class="foo"
13:48:47 Ben: need a DOM interpretation of how to declare a base CURIE
13:49:07 Mark: I was just thinking we'd need to specify rel and everything else would fall out of the profile
13:49:23 ... might even be able to do this just in prose
13:49:55 Ben: if the preprocessing step is just done with DOM calls then whatever happens to set the CURIE base needs to be reflected in the DOM somehow
13:50:10 Mark: not sure; could just say "when used in a DOM, RDFa has this meaning ..."
13:51:10 ... ah, but if the spec says "if you see x.y construct, go consult a.b document" then maybe we do need something more
13:53:10 href="foo" --> URI
13:53:24 rel="foo"
13:53:39 Ben: what do we mean by rel="foo" ?
13:53:42 current URI = http://example.org/bar
13:54:00 rel="foo" --> what is the CURIE?
13:54:33 Steven: I see use cases for both, and I'm having trouble deciding
13:54:42 ... rel="next" is a use case for "current document"
13:54:47 rel="next" --> rel="xh:next"
13:54:51 Ben: we want to special-case rel="next"
13:55:07 ... to have a specific transform
13:55:18 Mark: like a pre-processing step
13:56:35 ... the pre-processing idea got us back to nicer syntax without losing compatibility for things like rel='next'
13:57:11 Steven: as I understand it, this "local namespace" idea is for grandfathering unqualified rel values that aren't in the HTML namespace
13:57:50 Ben: intertwined with notion of adding default CURIE base; wouldn't want next to transform to xh:next
14:02:00 -Ralph
14:05:28 -Steven
14:05:29 -Ben_Adida
14:05:30 -Mark
14:05:32 SW_BPD(rdfxhtml)9:00AM has ended
14:05:34 Attendees were Ralph, Ben_Adida, Steven, Mark
14:20:20 benadida has left #htmltf
15:12:13 rrsagent, please draft minutes
15:12:13 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/05/15-htmltf-minutes.html RalphS
15:38:40 Zakim has left #htmltf