This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:ODRL Community Group Other specs in this tool
Status: allopen proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other Type: allsubstantive editorial typo question general comment undefined
Quick access to LC-2990
There are 1 comments (sorted by their types, and the section they are about).
These editorial comments are primarily aimed at aligning the ODRL Ontology spec with the Common Vocabulary spec. 1 - Update title to "ODRL Version 2.1 Ontology" 2 - The "Offer", "Agreement", and "Offer and next Policy" scenario examples need to update the pay duty to compensate and use a constraint for the payAmount (not an asset) 3 - The "Multiple assets" scenario example needs to define x:collection as a o:relation sub-property 4 - The "event" property also defines a specific value ("playUsage") - need to add this 5 - All of the Actions need their definitions to be updated (copy/paste from the Common Vocab document) as we have updated all the definitions (from "grantUse" right up to "watermark") 6 - "aggregate", "annotate", and "anonymize" have Broader Term "use" 7 - deprecate "appendTo", "lease", "lend", "preview", "secondaryUse", and "writeTo" 8 - deprecate "copy" and recommend to use "reproduce" 9 - "display" is not equivalent to "execute" (and vice-versa) 10 - deprecate "export" and recommend to use "transform" 11 - deprecate "license" and recommend to use "grantUse" 12 - "modify" is not equivalent to "derive" (and vice-versa) 13 - deprecate "pay" and recommend to use "compensate" 14 - "play" is not equivalent to "present" - "present" is a Broader Term 15 - "present" - move "play" from equivalent to narrower term 16 - add "transfer" and "use” actions (these need to be explicitly defined in the Common Vocab as well) Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Add a comment.