This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Other specs in this tool Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-1690 LC-1691 LC-1692 LC-1693 LC-1694 LC-1695 LC-1696 LC-1697 LC-1698 LC-1699 LC-1700 LC-1701 LC-1702 LC-1703 LC-1704 LC-1705 LC-1706 LC-1707 LC-1708 LC-1709 LC-1710 LC-1711 LC-1712 LC-1713 LC-1714 LC-1715 LC-1716 LC-1717 LC-1718 LC-1719 LC-1720 LC-1721 LC-1722 LC-1723 LC-1724 LC-1725 LC-1726 LC-1727 LC-1728 LC-1729 LC-1730 LC-1731 LC-1732 LC-1733 LC-1734 LC-1735 LC-1736 LC-1737 LC-1738 LC-1739 LC-1740 LC-1741 LC-1742 LC-1743 LC-1744 LC-1745 LC-1746 LC-1747 LC-1748 LC-1749 LC-1750 LC-1751 LC-1752 LC-1753 LC-1754 LC-1755 LC-1756 LC-1757 LC-1758 LC-1759 LC-1760 LC-1761 LC-1762 LC-1763 LC-1764 LC-1765 LC-1766 LC-1767 LC-1781 LC-1782 LC-1783 LC-1786
Previous: LC-1723 Next: LC-1737
First, section 2.3.2 HTTP Request states: > * > > Include an |Accept| header indicating that Internet media types > understood by the default delivery context are accepted by > sending exactly this header: > > Accept: application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.1,application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml;q=0.1,text/css,image/jpeg,image/gif > > I think this is incorrect, text/css should NOT be included in the Accept header, and image/jpeg and image/gif ONLY if the UA is expected to support showing these images independantly of a document (the mobileOK tests should explicitly check whether this is supported). The client after all does not know how to handle a text/css file independently of XML markup. Instead, it should send an "Accept: text/css" header when the CSS files that are linked using <link rel="stylesheet">, <?xml-stylesheet?> or @include. Similarly, images referenced from <img> should send an "Accept: image/jpeg,image/gif" header. Aside from checking the Accept header for the main page, the mobileOK tests should also check that Accept headers send these values for stylesheet and image requests.