IRC log of er on 2006-02-01

Timestamps are in UTC.

15:04:26 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #er
15:04:26 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-irc
15:04:32 [shadi]
zakim, this will be ert
15:04:32 [Zakim]
ok, shadi, I see WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM already started
15:04:41 [CarlosI]
CarlosI has joined #er
15:04:53 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller.aa]
15:05:04 [shadi]
zakim, who is here?
15:05:04 [Zakim]
On the phone I see [IPcaller], [IPcaller.a], Jim_Ley, [IPcaller.aa]
15:05:05 [Zakim]
On IRC I see CarlosI, RRSAgent, Zakim, niq, ChrisR, JibberJim, drooks, shadi, ericP
15:05:18 [Zakim]
+Shadi
15:05:22 [JibberJim]
zakim, IPcaller.aa is really niq
15:05:22 [Zakim]
+niq; got it
15:06:06 [JibberJim]
zakim, IPcaller is really drooks
15:06:06 [Zakim]
+drooks; got it
15:06:15 [JibberJim]
zakim, IPcaller.a is really ChrisR
15:06:15 [Zakim]
+ChrisR; got it
15:06:48 [shadi]
meeting: ERT WG
15:06:54 [shadi]
regrets: Johannes, Carlos
15:07:00 [shadi]
regrets: Johannes, CarlosV
15:07:07 [Zakim]
+Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
15:07:13 [shadi]
scribe: Nick
15:07:18 [shadi]
scribenick: niq
15:07:31 [shadi]
agenda+ EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues
15:07:51 [shadi]
zakim, take up agendum 1
15:07:51 [Zakim]
agendum 1. "EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues" taken up [from shadi]
15:08:09 [shadi]
agenda+ HTTP in RDF namespaces
15:08:46 [niq]
saz: testCase and testRequirement
15:12:46 [niq]
carlosi: requirement != test
15:13:51 [niq]
saz/carlosi: should we allow multiple requirements in one assertion?
15:15:53 [JibberJim]
I think test case and requirement is a good thing, I agree with carlos's emails.
15:17:05 [drooks]
it may take several test cases to prove a requirement... hence an assertion should be allowed to have multiple test cases
15:18:01 [JibberJim]
Yes shadi, that's what I meant, and we allow both
15:18:37 [niq]
Carlos, jim: requirement <--> testcase is a many-to-many thing
15:19:53 [niq]
RESOLUTION: testCase and testRequirement are distinct and both required
15:21:19 [shadi]
s/and both required/and should be both included
15:22:31 [shadi]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jan/0048
15:23:45 [niq]
saz: earl for streaming contents?
15:24:53 [niq]
jim: EARL doesn't need to do anything. We already allow people to define their own pointers into contents
15:25:21 [JibberJim]
Yes
15:25:55 [niq]
saz: nice to speel that out + example for earl guide
15:31:31 [niq]
saz: no meet next week; use mailinglist
15:31:31 [shadi]
ci: about to propose additions to the schema
15:31:50 [shadi]
zakim, close item 1
15:31:50 [Zakim]
agendum 1, EARL 1.0 Schema - open issues, closed
15:31:51 [Zakim]
I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
15:31:52 [Zakim]
2. HTTP in RDF namespaces [from shadi]
15:31:57 [shadi]
zakim, take up item 2
15:31:57 [Zakim]
agendum 2. "HTTP in RDF namespaces" taken up [from shadi]
15:33:14 [niq]
saz: one namespace for http?
15:33:18 [niq]
jim: yes
15:33:56 [niq]
CarlosI: possible ambiguity re: extension headers
15:34:57 [niq]
nrk: http:request-this, http:response-that
15:36:13 [niq]
nrk: two-level namespace
15:36:38 [niq]
saz: that looks like what johannes suggests
15:37:57 [niq]
provisional resolution as above, but wait for johannes before firming it up?
15:39:50 [Zakim]
-Jim_Ley
15:39:51 [Zakim]
-ChrisR
15:39:53 [Zakim]
-drooks
15:39:56 [ChrisR]
ChrisR has left #er
15:39:57 [Zakim]
-niq
15:40:00 [Zakim]
-Shadi
15:40:02 [Zakim]
-Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
15:40:03 [Zakim]
WAI_ERTWG()10:00AM has ended
15:40:04 [drooks]
drooks has left #er
15:40:05 [Zakim]
Attendees were Jim_Ley, Shadi, niq, drooks, ChrisR, Jose_Manuel_Alonso/CarlosI
16:28:06 [shadi]
chair: Shadi
16:28:16 [shadi]
rrsagent, make minutes
16:28:16 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-minutes.html shadi
16:28:22 [shadi]
rrsagent, make logs world
16:28:26 [shadi]
rrsagent, make minutes
16:28:26 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/02/01-er-minutes.html shadi
16:28:30 [shadi]
rrsagent, bye
16:28:30 [RRSAgent]
I see no action items