ACTION-54: propose baseline device description
propose baseline device description
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Charles McCathieNevile
- Due on:
- September 14, 2005
- Created on:
- September 8, 2005
- Related emails:
- RE: ISSUE-9, ACTION-53 and ACTION-54 Baseline Device etc. - Proposed Text For Scope Section of Best Practices Document (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2005-10-12)
- RE: ISSUE-9, ACTION-53 and ACTION-54 Baseline Device etc. -Proposed Text For Scope Section of Best Practices Document (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2005-10-12)
- RE: ISSUE-9, ACTION-53 and ACTION-54 Baseline Device etc. - Proposed Text For Scope Section of Best Practices Document (from johan.hjelm@ericsson.com on 2005-10-05)
- RE: ISSUE-9, ACTION-53 and ACTION-54 Baseline Device etc. - Proposed Text For Scope Section of Best Practices Document (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-30)
- RE: New BP document draft (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-09-29)
- Re: Baseline capabilities (from andrea@trasatti.it on 2005-09-25)
- Baseline capabilities (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-09-23)
- [agenda] BPWG Sep 22 Teleconf (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2005-09-21)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-15)
- [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-14)
- Re: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from parcher@icra.org on 2005-09-14)
- RE: [agenda] Thusrday September 15 (from gaaron@afilias.info on 2005-09-14)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from Tim@bango.com on 2005-09-09)
- RE: ISSUE-8: should MobileOK be awarded to walled gardens? (from paul.walsh@segalamtest.com on 2005-09-09)
- [minutes] Teleconf Sept 8 (from dom@w3.org on 2005-09-08)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log.