ISSUE-44: Implication of EXI strict mode and lexical value preservation
Implication of EXI strict mode and lexical value preservation
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EXI Spec
- Raised by:
- Daniel Peintner
- Opened on:
- 2009-09-23
- Description:
- We may need to add a note to section "8.5.4.4.2 Adding Productions when Strict is True" that the combination of Strict and preserve.LexicalValues set to TRUE may not suceed to encode a schema-valid document in all cases. This is due to the fact that the right path in the automaton may not be taken.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Sep/0031.html - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Tomorrow's Agenda (from msc@mitre.org on 2009-10-13)
- RE: EXI : xsi:type and xsi:nil when lexicalValues is true (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-10-12)
- RE: EXI : xsi:type and xsi:nil when lexicalValues is true (from john.schneider@agiledelta.com on 2009-10-08)
- RE: EXI : xsi:type and xsi:nil when lexicalValues is true (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-10-07)
- Agenda for this week's telecon (from msc@mitre.org on 2009-10-06)
- Agenda for 30 September Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-09-29)
- ISSUE-44: Implication of EXI strict mode and lexical value preservation [EXI Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-09-23)
- Agenda for 23 September Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-09-22)
Related notes:
TK do not think we need to set out anything special for xsi:type, given an existing provision in "6.3 Fidelity Options".
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Sep/0041.html
JS to take a closer look on this issue.
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Sep/0051.html
JS updated the spec to accurately describe how the values of xsi:type and xsi:nil attributes get encoded.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Sep/0062.html
TK proposed to add a sentence suggesting the use of Preserve.prefixes when xsi:type is used in lexical preservation mode.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Oct/0027.html
JS made an improvement to the sentence previously proposed by TK.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Oct/0031.html
The suggested changes have made.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-edits/2009Oct/0008.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Oct/0042.html
There was no disagreement expressed during the 2009-10-14 telecon when the WG discussed this issue.
Takuki Kamiya, 14 Oct 2009, 23:41:28Display change log