ACTION-451: Draft response to LC-2177
Draft response to LC-2177
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Jaakko Kangasharju
- Due on:
- December 24, 2008
- Created on:
- December 17, 2008
- Associated Product:
- EXI Spec
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTION-451: Draft response to LC-2177 (from jkangash@cc.hut.fi on 2009-05-11)
- Agenda for 01 Apr EXI Telecon (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-03-31)
- EXI Telecon Agenda (from msc@mitre.org on 2009-03-24)
- ACTION-451: Draft response to LC-2177 (from jkangash@cc.hut.fi on 2009-03-20)
- RE: Spreading the perquisites across (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-03-12)
- Re: Spreading the perquisites across (from jkangash@cc.hut.fi on 2009-03-12)
- Spreading the perquisites across (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2009-03-11)
- Minutes of the EXI telecon of 17-Dec-2008 (from tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com on 2008-12-17)
Related notes:
Original comment:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-exi-comments/2008Nov/0009.html
(Item #6 in particular)
Youenn is right.
We do not want to dictate something that is not absolutely
necessary. We can choose a wording that suggests it is a good
practice to sort attributes for compactness.
JK took up this action item.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Mar/0038.html
Draft response.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009Mar/0061.html
Discussed in 2009-04-01 telecon.
Jaakko is going to describe some condition that makes his case.
Also, we'd better mention that xsi:type and xsi:nil must come first
before any other attributes, regardless of the relaxation we are providing
by this.
Draft response.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-exi-wg/2009May/0008.html
Draft text was approved in 2009-05-13 telecon.
Takuki Kamiya, 13 May 2009, 19:17:09Responded (JK).
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-exi-comments/2009May/0006.html
Display change log.