IRC log of ws-cg on 2002-05-14
- [chris]
- ACTION: Eric to have RDF-core, WebOnt, and? review SOAP Data
Model, determine initial assessment as to whether it is 2" or 2mi
apart from their DLG model and channel that feedback through a
single point of contact [CONTINUED]
- [DavidF]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/cg/2/04/30-minutes
- [Marsh]
- Zakim, who's here?
- [Zakim]
- I see Fallside, Chris.Ferris, Jonathan
- [Marsh]
- Regrets from Hugo. Eric absent.
- Hugo's action: update calendar - DONE.
- All other actions from last week.
- DONE
- ---
- XML CG report
- Not meeting this week or last week.
- So no report :-)
- ----
- FTF dates
- Arch WG agreed to FTF dates in November.
- Preference may be Macromedia in Boston.
- JM encouraged Alan Kotok to get logistics info to David
Booth.
- Seems to be progressing.
- Protocol is postponing the June FTF for a few weeks.
- Want to go to last call first, so the FTF can deal with last
call issues.
- Possibly 4-6 week delay.
- PCotton volunteered Redmond as a backup host if SAP can't
accomodate the date change.
- ----
- Chat about chartering new WGs
- [chris]
- http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/05/09-minutes.html
- [Marsh]
- End of those minutes discuss what it would take to get a
Security group underway.
- What does this mean for IPR?
- [chris]
- hugo's mail:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-arch/2002May/0105.html
- [Marsh]
- New WGs need to charter the CPP.
- There seems to be a majority in the arch group that wants to
get things rolling earlier.
- The scope of the WG still needs to be nailed down.
- Might be similar to the scope of WS-Security.
- Or, a respository for any Security-related topics as Arch
progresses.
- (Discussion about a number of more limited WGs versus a group
that would get periodic charter updates to accomodate new
deliverables.)
- [Zakim]
- WS_WSCG()1:00PM has ended
- [chris]
- rrsagent list actions
- [DavidF]
- ACTION: DavidF to investigate chater writing
- [chris]
- RRSAgent, please list actions
- [RRSAgent]
- I see 2 action items:
- ACTION: Eric to have RDF-core, WebOnt, and? review SOAP Data
Model, determine initial assessment as to whether it is 2" or 2mi
apart from their DLG model and channel that feedback through a
single point of contact [CONTINUED] [1]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/05/14-ws-cg-irc#T17-06-23
- ACTION: DavidF to investigate chater writing [2]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/05/14-ws-cg-irc#T18-04-05
- [chris]
- RRSAgent, please excuse us