ISSUE-175: Emotion vocabularies should not use custom mechanism
Emotion vocabularies should not use custom mechanism
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmoLCC
- Raised by:
- Marc Schröder
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-13
- Description:
- Subject: Vocab Namespaces?
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:33:09 +0000
Resent-From: www-multimodal@w3.org
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:30:20 +1000
From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
To: www-multimodal@w3.org
In the Emotion Markup Language (EmotionML) 1.0 (W3C Working Draft 7 April 2011) - why don't you use namespaces for vocab terms? (which is the more common approach, with QNAMES, or even CURIES)
So the example (just before section 2.2.2) would be:
<emotion xmlns:big6="http://www.w3.org/TR/emotion-voc/xml#big6">
<category name="big6:sadness" value="0.3"/>
<category name="big6:anger" value="0.8"/>
<category name="big6:fear" value="0.3"/>
</emotion>
And, of course, that namespace can be defined at the top-level and reused elsewhere...
Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emo] Minutes of today's emotion call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-07-20)
- Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-28)
- Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-22)
- RE: [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from paolo.baggia@loquendo.com on 2011-06-21)
- [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-21)
- [emo] Minutes of emotionml call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-15)
- [emo] minutes from EmotionML call 1/6/2011 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2011-06-07)
- Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-01)
- Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-01)
- Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-01)
- [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-05-30)
- [emo[ Some new information for the discussion on namespaces-for-referring-to-vocabularies (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-05-17)
- [emo] Minutes May 4, 2011 (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2011-05-04)
- ISSUE-175: PUBLIC: Vocab namespaces? [EmoLCC] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)
Related notes:
RESULT=REJECTED
ACCEPTANCE=EXPLICIT,http://www.w3.org/mid/07495453-D958-4B11-8E98-5327B0C09C8F%2540semanticidentity.com
we need a result category "deferred", so should ignore the older comment
Marc Schröder, 20 Jul 2011, 09:09:45RESULT=DEFERRED
Marc Schröder, 20 Jul 2011, 09:10:23ACCEPTANCE=EXPLICIT,http://www.w3.org/mid/07495453-D958-4B11-8E98-5327B0C09C8F%2540semanticidentity.com
Marc Schröder, 20 Jul 2011, 09:10:42Display change log