ISSUE-167: What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies?
What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmotionML
- Raised by:
- Marc Schröder
- Opened on:
- 2010-11-10
- Description:
- If part of the spec, they are static; if we put them somewhere on the MMI web space, we can change them over time.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emo] minutes of today's call (March 02, 2011) (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2011-03-02)
- Re: [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from ashimura@w3.org on 2011-03-02)
- [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-02-28)
- [emo] minutes 2011/2/16 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2011-02-16)
- [emo] Discussion needed: Where to put our 'recommended' vocabularies? (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-01-14)
- Re: [emo] minutes (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2010-12-09)
- [emo] minutes (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2010-12-08)
- ISSUE-167: What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-11-10)
Related notes:
explanation email to MMI group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2011Feb/0006.html
Marc Schröder, 16 Feb 2011, 10:16:23Group has decided to prefer dynamic registry, ideally at W3C
Marc Schröder, 16 Feb 2011, 10:17:48Display change log