ISSUE-128: Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names?
Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmotionML
- Raised by:
- Kazuyuki Ashimura
- Opened on:
- 2010-02-03
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emo] Revised EmotionML syntax (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-04-14)
- Re: [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from ashimura@w3.org on 2010-02-04)
- RE: [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-02-03)
- [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-02-03)
- ISSUE-128: Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-03)
Related notes:
This issue becomes obsolete through the adoption of the revised EmotionML syntax as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Apr/0029.html
Marc Schröder, 14 May 2010, 09:07:48Display change log