w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: iframe element has accessible name
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2020-07-06 to 2020-07-22.
4 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Instructions
- Consistency with ACT Rules Format
- Rule assumptions
- Implementation data
- Consistent with WCAG
- Remaining open issues
- Other questions or concerns
- Readiness for publishing
1. Instructions
The rule iframe element has accessible name has been updated too resolve Issue 435. Review the rule and answer the questions in the survey.
If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results |
Details
| Responder | Instructions |
|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | |
| Wilco Fiers | |
| Kathy Eng | |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | Yes |
3. Rule assumptions
Are the assumptions acceptable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 2 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | 2 |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | The assumption is out of date. I left a comment about it here: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1384 |
| Kathy Eng | Yes | |
| Mary Jo Mueller | No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | Assumptions need updating per the comments Wilco made. |
4. Implementation data
Is the implementation data correct?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 2 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | Editorial: The note under failed example 4 has two colons. Are we allowing notes inside of the examples, or should we find a different place for that as well. |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | https://act-rules.github.io/rules/cae760#inapplicable-example-3 Inapplicable Example 3 - This iframe element has a negative tabindex and therefore is not included in the sequential focus navigation. <iframe tabindex="-1" src="/test-assets/SC4-1-2-frame-doc.html"> </iframe> Is this included in the accessibility tree? If so, it should not be inapplicable. |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
5. Consistent with WCAG
Is the rule consistent with existing WCAG documents?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 1 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | 1 |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Consistent with WCAG | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Wilco Fiers | No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | Implementations are missing |
| Kathy Eng | I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. | there's recent emails about iframes need a title from the wcag group that discusses the need for this rule. |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
6. Remaining open issues
Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | 1 |
| Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | 1 |
| No, there are no open issues. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Wilco Fiers | Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1367 There is a pull request for it here: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1384 |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | #1367 and #1170. |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
7. Other questions or concerns
Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 1 |
| No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 2 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | Could the note in the applicability section moved under accessibility support as possibly unsupported by browsers? |
| Wilco Fiers | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
8. Readiness for publishing
Do you think this rule is ready to be published?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 1 |
| No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | 2 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Bostic | No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | Need to determine how to handle the notes before publishing for consistency I think. |
| Wilco Fiers | No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | clarify inapplicable example 3 |
| Mary Jo Mueller |
More details on responses
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Romain Deltour
- Alastair Campbell
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Helen Burge
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
- Sage Keriazes
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project