w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire ACT TF - Rule Review: Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: team-wcag-act-surveys@w3.org,maryjom@us.ibm.com,wilco.fiers@deque.com
This questionnaire was open from 2021-02-08 to 2021-02-18.
4 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Instructions
- Consistency with ACT Rules Format
- Rule assumptions
- Implementation data
- Consistent with accessibility requirements
- Remaining open issues
- Other questions or concerns
- Rule is up-to-date
- Readiness for publishing
1. Instructions
Review the rule Menuitem has non-empty accessible name and answer the questions in this survey.
If there are issues with the rule, you may either open an issue in GitHub or provide details in the entry fields for the applicable question.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results |
Details
| Responder | Instructions |
|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | |
| Trevor Bostic | |
| Levon Spradlin | |
| Kathy Eng |
2. Consistency with ACT Rules Format
Does the rule follow the ACT Rules Format 1.0?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistency with ACT Rules Format | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | In accessibility support, change "the title attribute is not in all circumstance a reliable..." to "the title attribute is not a reliable way to provide an accessible name in all circumstances" -- maybe even remove "in all circumstances" |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
3. Rule assumptions
Are the assumptions acceptable?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Rule assumptions | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
4. Implementation data
Is the implementation data correct?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Implementation data | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
5. Consistent with accessibility requirements
Is the rule consistent with existing accessibility standards (e.g. WCAG, ARIA, etc.)?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes | 4 |
| No. I have opened an issue in GitHub or have documented my comments below. | |
| I don't know. My questions or comments are documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Consistent with accessibility requirements | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes |
6. Remaining open issues
Are there any remaining open issues for this rule that were opened prior to this review?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes there are open issues that need to be resolved. I have listed them below. | |
| Yes, there are open issues but they don't need to be resolved for the rule to be published. | |
| No, there are no open issues. | 4 |
Details
| Responder | Remaining open issues | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Trevor Bostic | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Levon Spradlin | No, there are no open issues. | |
| Kathy Eng | No, there are no open issues. |
7. Other questions or concerns
Do you have any further questions or concerns about this rule?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | 2 |
| No, I have no further questions or concerns. | 1 |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Other questions or concerns | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | ||
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | Failed example 2 seems a bit like a duplicate of failed example 1, but I don't have any suggestions on an example to replace it with either. |
| Levon Spradlin | No, I have no further questions or concerns. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, I have questions or concerns, described below. | Under Accessibility Support, please explain why does it say "buttons" - Depending on this, some elements can have a semantic role of button and fail this rule with some technology but users of other technologies would not experience any accessibility issue. |
8. Rule is up-to-date
Is the rule up to date? If so, the accessibility support should still be relevant, it should follow the recommended writing style, and use up to date links.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, all information is up-to-date. | 4 |
| No, it needs the following changes. | |
| I don't know, but I have the following concerns. |
Details
| Responder | Rule is up-to-date | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, all information is up-to-date. | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, all information is up-to-date. | |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes, all information is up-to-date. | |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, all information is up-to-date. |
9. Readiness for publishing
Do you think this rule is ready to be published?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | 1 |
| Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | 3 |
| No, it is not ready to publish and the reason is documented below. |
Details
| Responder | Readiness for publishing | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Wilco Fiers | Yes, it is ready to publish as-is. | |
| Trevor Bostic | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Small editorial change above. |
| Levon Spradlin | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Nothing needed other than the editorial changes noted |
| Kathy Eng | Yes, it is ready to publish with the following changes. | Accessibility Support comment (#7) |
More details on responses
- Wilco Fiers: last responded on 9, February 2021 at 11:21 (UTC)
- Trevor Bostic: last responded on 10, February 2021 at 19:47 (UTC)
- Levon Spradlin: last responded on 10, February 2021 at 23:04 (UTC)
- Kathy Eng: last responded on 17, February 2021 at 21:56 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- David MacDonald
- Romain Deltour
- Alastair Campbell
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Detlev Fischer
- Chris Loiselle
- Jonathan Avila
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- Charles Adams
- Daniel Montalvo
- Helen Burge
- Todd Libby
- Thomas Brunet
- Catherine Droege
- Suji Sreerama
- Shane Dittmar
- Nayan Padrai
- Sage Keriazes
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project