W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Thorough review and CFC for CR publication

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2019-02-15 to 2019-02-21.

6 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Is pull request 328 ready to merge?
ACT Rules Format 1.0 publication as a Candidate Recommendation

1. Is pull request 328 ready to merge?

Review recent edits (with feedback from the 14 February call incorporated) that have been made in pull request 328. If you wish to read the changes in the context of the full spec, read the editor's draft ACT Rules Format 1.0 (15 February).

Can pull request 328 be merged?

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Yes, the changes are acceptable as-is.	4
Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.	2
No. I have left reasons for my objection in the comments of the pull request.

Details

Responder	Is pull request 328 ready to merge?	Comments
Wilco Fiers	Yes, the changes are acceptable as-is.
Stein Erik Skotkjerra	Yes, the changes are acceptable as-is.
Anne Thyme Nørregaard	Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.	I have one comment for line 322, that I think we need to have a look at. See answer for question 2, or comments on PR #328.
Charu Pandhi	Yes, the changes are acceptable as-is.
Romain Deltour	Yes, with suggestions for improvements in the comments of the pull request.
Mary Jo Mueller	Yes, the changes are acceptable as-is.

2. ACT Rules Format 1.0 publication as a Candidate Recommendation

Please review the current editor's draft of the ACT Rules Format 1.0 (15 February) for its readiness for publication for public review as a Candidate Recommendation. Once our task force approves, we'll take the draft to the AG WG for their approval to publish as a CR.

Is the ACT Rules Format 1.0 draft ready to publish as a Candidate Recommendation?

Summary

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is as a Candidate Recommendation.	4
Yes, the draft is ready for publication as a CR, with the edits/changes proposed in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.	2
No, the draft is not ready for publication for the reasons documented in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.

Details

Responder	ACT Rules Format 1.0 publication as a Candidate Recommendation	Comments
Wilco Fiers	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is as a Candidate Recommendation.
Stein Erik Skotkjerra	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is as a Candidate Recommendation.
Anne Thyme Nørregaard	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as a CR, with the edits/changes proposed in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.	I suggest we remove this sentence from line 322: "This assertion is true when the [=test subject=] satisfies the [=accessibility requirement=]." I think the sentence is a leftover from a previous version, and it doesn't match the rest of the spec, since not all rules are required to have accessibility requirements and only few rules are "satisfying tests" where we can actually say the accessibility requirement is satisfied. (also left as a comment on PR #328)
Charu Pandhi	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is as a Candidate Recommendation.
Romain Deltour	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as a CR, with the edits/changes proposed in a GitHub issue or in the comments below.	(all editorial suggestions were made in PR #328)
Mary Jo Mueller	Yes, the draft is ready for publication as-is as a Candidate Recommendation.