w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Understanding sections for WCAG 2.1
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2017-12-06 to 2017-12-31.
3 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. Personlization 1
Look at the understanding section for identify common purpose (was purpose of controls). Does it give the "what, why and how" for the success criteria.
What would you add?Details
| Responder | Personlization 1 |
|---|---|
| Lisa Seeman-Horwitz | need to add tabe were we say for each item on the list what specification supports it. add example pages? |
| John Rochford | "understanding section ..." link is a #404 |
| Mark Wilcock | Error 404: Not Found - Therefore cannot comment on this resource. |
2. Personlization 2
Look at the understanding section for identify contextual-information. Does it give the "what, why and how" for the success criteria.
What would you add?Details
| Responder | Personlization 2 |
|---|---|
| Lisa Seeman-Horwitz | need more examples on how to meet it add use case were symbols are the natrial language of the user translations do not work |
| John Rochford | Suggestion: Consider "enable" instead of "allow" because "allow" implies permission. Yes, what, why, and how are given. Nothing to add. |
| Mark Wilcock | Yes, what, why and how are covered. Additional examples could prove beneficial, possibly of a visual nature. |
3. timeouts
Look at the understanding section for timouts (min). Does it give the "what, why and how" for the success criteria.
What would you add?Details
| Responder | timeouts |
|---|---|
| Lisa Seeman-Horwitz | need user example to stress that many people can not finish the task,often start things that they can not finish in the time, and therefor lose confidence in using the web. idealy you keep the user data and make it so that the user can start and finish a task.this includeds the aging and disabilities. however in cases where you can not do that at least warn them before thet start to reduce the fusttration. warnings mid-process are a fail. a warning should be given one time , before the user starts a process or task not at each step |
| John Rochford | Yes, what, why, and how are given. Nothing to add. |
| Mark Wilcock | Yes, what, why and how are covered. Additional clarification when timeouts should be displayed to the user, preferably once at the beginning of that task/process. |
4. interruptions
Look at the understanding section for interruptions. Does it give the "what, why and how" for the success criteria.
What would you add?Details
| Responder | interruptions |
|---|---|
| Lisa Seeman-Horwitz | |
| John Rochford | Yes, what, why, and how are given. Nothing to add. |
| Mark Wilcock | Yes, what, why and how are covered. Error 404 for "COGA Techniques" link. Techniques sections could be expanded. |
5. accessible authentication
Look at the understanding section for accessible authentication. Does it give the "what, why and how" for the success criteria.
What would you add?Details
| Responder | accessible authentication |
|---|---|
| Lisa Seeman-Horwitz | we can make this better by including the answers and information on the wcag list discusions. this includeds: stressing that a useable alternitive is suffient the user is alowed to pay for extra equiment such as a dongle diffrent aprouches that may become allowed conformence to the web-authification is a prefered technque |
| John Rochford | There are significant grammatical problems that make the understanding doc difficult to understand. I will fix them. The SC needs a revision. |
| Mark Wilcock | Yes, what, why and how are covered. The wording is slightly confusing, compared to that of the other understanding sections. |
More details on responses
- Lisa Seeman-Horwitz: last responded on 7, December 2017 at 14:21 (UTC)
- John Rochford: last responded on 10, December 2017 at 20:49 (UTC)
- Mark Wilcock: last responded on 11, December 2017 at 22:50 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Janina Sajka
- Deborah Dahl
- Katie Haritos-Shea
- Jeanne F Spellman
- Alastair Campbell
- Mary Jo Mueller
- John Kirkwood
- Mike Pluke
- Justine Pascalides
- Jan McSorley
- Matthew Atkinson
- E.A. Draffan
- Rachael Bradley Montgomery
- David Swallow
- Ruoxi Ran
- Charles Adams
- Jennifer Delisi
- David Fazio
- Marcos Franco Murillo
- Susana Pallero
- Rain Breaw Michaels
- Yao Ding
- Rashmi Katakwar
- Julie Rawe
- Rebecca Monteleone
- Jamie Vanderwall
- Eric Hind
- Katy Brickley
- Kimberly Sarabia
- Suji Sreerama
- Leonard Beasley
- Tiffany Burtin
- Frankie Wolf
- Samantha McDaniel
- Leandro S. Guedes
- Jeanne Erickson Cooley
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project