w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: zednis@rpi.edu
This questionnaire was open from 2012-01-11 to 2013-03-30.
9 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Responder | Name | URL | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Victor Rodriguez | Music Ontology to Media Value Chain Ontology and PROV-O Ontology Mapping | http://oeg-dev.dia.fi.upm.es/mvco-prov/ | Mapping between the Music Ontology, the Media Value Chain Ontology and the PROV-O. The Music Ontology describes general musical-related concepts, the Media Value Chain Ontology describes the Intellectual Property along the multimedia life-cycles and the PROV-O Ontology is the W3C standard for representing provenance information in the web. Together, these ontologies provide an homogeneous access to the chain of intermediate objects and actions that happen until a musical work is ready to be consumed (also known as the Music Workflow). |
Luc Moreau | PROV-DM: the PROV data model | http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/ | Provenance is information about entities, activities, and people involved in producing a piece of data or thing, which can be used to form assessments about its quality, reliability or trustworthiness. PROV-DM is the conceptual data model that forms a basis for the W3C provenance (PROV) family of specifications. PROV-DM distinguishes core structures, forming the essence of provenance information, from extended structures catering for more specific uses of provenance. PROV-DM is organized in six components, respectively dealing with: (1) entities and activities, and the time at which they were created, used, or ended; (2) derivations of entities from entities; (3) agents bearing responsibility for entities that were generated and activities that happened; (4) a notion of bundle, a mechanism to support provenance of provenance; (5) properties to link entities that refer to the same thing; and, (6) collections forming a logical structure for its members. This document introduces the provenance concepts found in PROV and defines PROV-DM types and relations. The PROV data model is domain-agnostic, but is equipped with extensibility points allowing domain-specific information to be included. Two further documents complete the specification of PROV-DM. First, a companion document specifies the set of constraints that provenance should follow. Second, a separate document describes a provenance notation for expressing instances of provenance for human consumption; this notation is used in examples in this document. The PROV Document Overview describes the overall state of PROV, and should be read before other PROV documents. |
Jens Lehmann | DBpedia | http://dbpedia.org | |
Rinke Hoekstra | AERS-LD | http://aers.data2semantics.org | RDF representation of the Adverse Events repository of the FDA. Contains descriptions in PROV on how this data was constructed. |
James McCusker | TWC Healthdata | http://healthdata.tw.rpi.edu | This site provides the Department of Health and Human Services' HealthData.gov Platform (HDP) as part of the semantic web. |
Ashley Smith | University of Southampton Open Data | http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ | The University of Southampton makes all of its non-confidential data public as linked open data. As most staff are not familiar with this, a team from iSolutions process and convert this data from its original formats and collate it on the open data site. The conversion process is described in PROV. |
Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez | SIGNA | http://geo.linkeddata.es/ | SIGNA is a dataset associated with the Geographic Information System of the Spanish National Geographic Institute. This dataset collects points of interest (POIs) that are made available as RDF (Resource Description Framework) knowledge bases according to the Linked Data principles. The provenance of the whole process is tracked using PROV-O terms. |
Daniel Garijo | Dublin Core to PROV mapping | http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dc/ | Document providin a mapping between the Dublin Core Terms and the PROV-O ontology |
Sarven Capadisli | OECD Linked Data | http://oecd.270a.info/ | OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) data published using the Linked Data design principles. |
Responder | Name | |
---|---|---|
Victor Rodriguez | Daniel Garijo | dgarijo@fi.upm.es |
Luc Moreau | Luc Moreau (prov-dm editor, on behalf of the Provenance Working Group) | l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk |
Jens Lehmann | Jens Lehmann | lehmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de |
Rinke Hoekstra | Rinke Hoekstra | rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl |
James McCusker | James McCusker | mccusj@rpi.edu |
Ashley Smith | Ashley Smith | ads04r@ecs.soton.ac.uk |
Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez | Daniel Garijo; Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez | dgarijo@fi.upm.es; lmvilches@fi.upm.es |
Daniel Garijo | Daniel Garijo | dgarijo@fi.upm.es |
Sarven Capadisli | Sarven Capadisli | info@csarven.ca |
summary | by responder | by choice
Choose all that apply
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
PROV-O | 7 |
PROV-N | 1 |
PROV-XML | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | PROV Encodings Supported | Please list any additional supported encodings (e.g. PROV-JSON, PROV-CSV, etc.) in the free-text area below |
---|---|---|
Victor Rodriguez |
|
|
Luc Moreau |
|
|
Jens Lehmann |
|
|
Rinke Hoekstra |
|
|
James McCusker |
|
|
Ashley Smith |
|
|
Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez |
|
|
Daniel Garijo |
|
|
Sarven Capadisli |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
PROV-O |
|
PROV-N |
|
PROV-XML |
|
Indicate covered features by selecting one of the following below:
Choice | All responders | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | No opinion | |
Entity | 6 | 3 | ||
Activity | 7 | 2 | ||
Agent | 7 | 2 | ||
Generation | 7 | 2 | ||
Usage | 7 | 2 | ||
Communication | 4 | 5 | ||
Derivation | 7 | 2 | ||
Attribution | 6 | 3 | ||
Association | 5 | 4 | ||
Delegation | 3 | 6 | ||
Start | 3 | 6 | ||
End | 3 | 6 | ||
Invalidation | 1 | 8 | ||
Revision | 3 | 6 | ||
Quotation | 1 | 8 | ||
PrimarySource | 2 | 7 | ||
Person | 1 | 8 | ||
Organization | 1 | 8 | ||
SoftwareAgent | 2 | 7 | ||
Plan | 3 | 6 | ||
Influence | 2 | 7 | ||
Bundle | 1 | 8 | ||
Specialization | 3 | 6 | ||
Alternate | 3 | 6 | ||
Collection | 1 | 8 | ||
EmptyCollection | 1 | 8 | ||
Membership | 1 | 8 | ||
Identifier | 1 | 8 | ||
Attributes | 1 | 8 | ||
Label | 1 | 8 | ||
Location | 2 | 7 | ||
Role | 2 | 7 | ||
Type | 1 | 8 | ||
Value | 2 | 7 |
Averages:
Choices | All responders: |
---|---|
Value | |
Entity | 2.00 |
Activity | 2.00 |
Agent | 2.00 |
Generation | 2.00 |
Usage | 2.00 |
Communication | 2.00 |
Derivation | 2.00 |
Attribution | 2.00 |
Association | 2.00 |
Delegation | 2.00 |
Start | 2.00 |
End | 2.00 |
Invalidation | 2.00 |
Revision | 2.00 |
Quotation | 2.00 |
PrimarySource | 2.00 |
Person | 2.00 |
Organization | 2.00 |
SoftwareAgent | 2.00 |
Plan | 2.00 |
Influence | 2.00 |
Bundle | 2.00 |
Specialization | 2.00 |
Alternate | 2.00 |
Collection | 2.00 |
EmptyCollection | 2.00 |
Membership | 2.00 |
Identifier | 2.00 |
Attributes | 2.00 |
Label | 2.00 |
Location | 2.00 |
Role | 2.00 |
Type | 2.00 |
Value | 2.00 |
Responder | Entity | Activity | Agent | Generation | Usage | Communication | Derivation | Attribution | Association | Delegation | Start | End | Invalidation | Revision | Quotation | PrimarySource | Person | Organization | SoftwareAgent | Plan | Influence | Bundle | Specialization | Alternate | Collection | EmptyCollection | Membership | Identifier | Attributes | Label | Location | Role | Type | Value | Rationale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Victor Rodriguez | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | The document http://oeg-dev.dia.fi.upm.es/mvco-prov/ Explains the rationale for each mapping in detail. The mapping proposes some subclassing of PROV-O concepts (so it could be considered an extension). However, since no new classes are proposed, it has been considered a "PROV usage". |
Luc Moreau | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | PROV-DM defines all these PROV features and illustrates them using the PROV notation. |
Jens Lehmann | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | |
Rinke Hoekstra | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | |
James McCusker | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | determined by SPARQL query to healthdata.tw.rpi.edu/sparql |
Ashley Smith | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | Our data is still under heavy development and features may be added or changed, sometimes by the hour. |
Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | |
Daniel Garijo | No opinion | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | The rationale for each term of the mapping can be seen here: http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dc/ |
Sarven Capadisli | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | 2 | 2 | 2 | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion | No opinion |
Responder | Provenance Exchange |
---|---|
Victor Rodriguez | |
Luc Moreau | All the examples in this document can be validated by ProvValidator (which is built in on the ProvToolbox used to parse them). |
Jens Lehmann | |
Rinke Hoekstra | Yes, it is generated by http://gitub.com/Data2Semantics/raw2ld |
James McCusker | csv2rdf4lod |
Ashley Smith | |
Luis M. Vilches-Blázquez | |
Daniel Garijo | |
Sarven Capadisli |
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.