w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Mobile Accessibility Note for approval
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2015-02-03 to 2015-02-05.
2 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Approve Introduction
- Approve section 2: Perceivable
- Approve section 3: Operable
- Approve section 4: Understandable
- Approve section 5: Robust
- Approve Appendix A WCAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile
- Approve Appendix B: UAAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile
1. Approve Introduction
Select whether you approve of the Introduction? General comments on the Note should also go here.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve Introduction | Comments on Introduction and general comments |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | The title of the Note is misleading. UAAG is only mentioned twice. Once in the introduction 1.2.1 and at the end "B. UAAG Success Criteria..." UAAG should be removed from the title. there are still a few @@ in the document |
| Jan Richards | yes |
2. Approve section 2: Perceivable
Do you approve of section 2: "Mobile accessibility considerations primarily related to Principle 1: Perceivable"?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve section 2: Perceivable | Comments on Perceivable section |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | |
| Jan Richards | yes |
3. Approve section 3: Operable
Do you approve of section 3: "Mobile accessibility considerations primarily related to Principle 2: Operable"?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve section 3: Operable | Comments on Operablesection |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | @@ present |
| Jan Richards | yes |
4. Approve section 4: Understandable
Do you approve of section 4: "Mobile accessibility considerations primarily related to Principle 3: Understandable"?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve section 4: Understandable | Comments on Understandablesection |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | |
| Jan Richards | yes |
5. Approve section 5: Robust
Do you approve of section 5: "Mobile accessibility considerations primarily related to Principle 4: Robust"?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve section 5: Robust | Comments on Robust |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | |
| Jan Richards | yes |
6. Approve Appendix A WCAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile
Do you approve of Appendix A: "Appendix A: WCAG 2.0 Techniques that Apply to Mobile"?
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve Appendix A WCAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile | Comments on Appendix A |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | |
| Jan Richards | yes |
7. Approve Appendix B: UAAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile
Do you approve of Appendix B: "Appendix B: UAAG 2.0 Success Criteria that Apply to Mobile"? NOTE: these are the Mobile Examples that we regularly publish with each update of UAAG 2.0 Reference.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 2 |
| no | |
| concur | |
| abstain |
Details
| Responder | Approve Appendix B: UAAG Techniques that Apply to Mobile | Comments on Appendix B |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Allan | yes | |
| Jan Richards | yes |
More details on responses
- Jim Allan: last responded on 4, February 2015 at 17:00 (UTC)
- Jan Richards: last responded on 5, February 2015 at 15:46 (UTC)
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project