w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2016-01-29 to 2016-02-04.
8 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read the 29 January EOWG teleconference meeting minutes (or summary) or indicate that you were on the call. Summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I attended the teleconference. | 7 |
I was not able to attend but have read the minutes and updated the wiki to indicate that fact. | 1 |
I did not attend and have not read the minutes yet. The date for my review is in the comment box below. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Attended/read summary of 29 January meeting | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
David Berman |
|
|
James Green |
|
|
Susan Hewitt |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I attended the teleconference. |
|
I was not able to attend but have read the minutes and updated the wiki to indicate that fact. |
|
I did not attend and have not read the minutes yet. The date for my review is in the comment box below. |
Brent's comment on the Big Picture highlighted that there was a gap in the resource exploring what to consider when the plan was put into action.
The Assign tasks and support delivery activity has been added to the Implement section in response.
Please review the content for this activity and add any comments in GitHub as new issues or pull requests. If you are not comfortable with GitHub, please add your comments below.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). | 4 |
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | 1 |
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group. | 3 |
Responder | Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: New activity | |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group. | |
Brent Bakken | I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). | |
David Berman | I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group. | |
James Green | I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). | no comments |
Susan Hewitt | I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | Next meeting |
Kevin White | I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). | [Document author] |
Sharron Rush | I reviewed it and have added comments (in GitHub or below). | |
Howard Kramer | I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on the document and accept the decisions of the Group. |
We've been working on the name/title of the resource described in the requirements analysis (rough prototype).
Please at least skim relevant parts of minutes:
The next two questions relate to aspects of this name.
Responder | Naming intro |
---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | |
Brent Bakken | |
David Berman | |
James Green | |
Susan Hewitt | |
Kevin White | |
Sharron Rush | |
Howard Kramer |
Please consider the perspectives on the pros(+) and cons(-) of specific words in:
Some of these perspectives are very important and should impact your ratings!
The list below does not include some ruled out because they could imply that we created or host the things: Repository, Library, Bank, Collection.
Please pick a number that indicates how much you think this word fits (given all the considerations shared in the minutes), with 1 being highest, and 9 being that you object to it.
(Please ignore the next paragraph; and ignore "Rank"; and in the options, ignore "don’t mind" and "don’t want" — we're using a survey template that doesn't work well.)
Choice | All responders | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Don’t mind | Don’t want | Ranked 1 | Ranked 2 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 4 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 6 | Ranked 7 | Ranked 8 | Ranked 9 | |
List | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Index | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Gallery | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Catalog | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
Hub | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Compendium | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
Directory | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Toolkit | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
other - in comments | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Responder | List | Index | Gallery | Catalog | Hub | Compendium | Directory | Toolkit | other - in comments | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | Ranked 2 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 8 | Ranked 2 | Ranked 7 | Ranked 7 | Ranked 8 | Ranked 7 | Don’t mind | |
Brent Bakken | Ranked 1 | Ranked 2 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 7 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 4 | Don’t mind | |
David Berman | Ranked 1 | Ranked 2 | Ranked 4 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 6 | Ranked 7 | Don’t want | Don’t mind | |
James Green | Ranked 7 | Ranked 6 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 1 | Ranked 9 | Ranked 8 | Ranked 4 | Ranked 9 | Ranked 9 | |
Susan Hewitt | Ranked 4 | Ranked 5 | Ranked 7 | Ranked 1 | Ranked 3 | Ranked 6 | Ranked 8 | Ranked 2 | Don’t mind | |
Kevin White | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Don’t want | Ranked 6 | I am not sure that anything is needed for 'X'. 'Accessible UI Components' describes what the page provides. Whether it is a list of them or a catalog of them or whatever adds nothing to the core name. |
Sharron Rush | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | At this point in the discussion I don't think the modifier is needed at all |
Howard Kramer | Don’t mind | Ranked 4 | Don’t mind | Don’t mind | Ranked 2 | Don’t want | Ranked 9 | Ranked 1 | Don’t mind |
Do you like this format?:
Choice | All responders | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes, but prefer not | Yes | Yes, and prefer | |
Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Accessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | 4 | 2 | 2 | |
Accessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Accessible UI Components [X] | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
other - in Comments below | 6 | 2 |
Ranking of choices in order of least unacceptable/most prefered:
Ranks | All responders: |
---|---|
1 | Accessible UI Components [X] |
2 | Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks |
3 | Accessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks |
4 | Accessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks |
5 | other - in Comments below |
Responder | Accessible UI Components [X]: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | Accessible UI Components [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | Accessible UI Components: [X] of Widgets, Templates, Frameworks | Accessible UI Components [X] | other - in Comments below | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | Yes, and prefer | No | Yes | No | No | |
Brent Bakken | Yes, and prefer | Yes | Yes, but prefer not | No | No | |
David Berman | Yes, but prefer not | Yes, but prefer not | Yes, and prefer | Yes, and prefer | No | |
James Green | No | No | No | Yes | No | |
Susan Hewitt | Yes | Yes, but prefer not | No | Yes, and prefer | No | |
Kevin White | No | No | No | Yes | No | General comment that specifying that these are Widgets, Templates, and Frameworks simlpy adds a limiting filter on what people might consider finding here. Not sure what use case adding the additional stuff responds to. |
Sharron Rush | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ...suggest to forget [X] and have the title be Accessible UI Components: Widgets, Templates, Frameworks |
Howard Kramer | No | No | Yes, and prefer | Yes | Yes |
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.