w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-02-16 to 2018-02-27.
15 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Nic and Shawn have made some copy edits and minor revisions to several EOWG Resources. The resources in this survey are ready for EOWG review and approval to publish.
There are 4 resources. Most have only copy edits or a couple minor changes.
Please review the few changes listed in the survey questions. That will take most people less than 30 minutes.
You do not need to review all the copy edits if you don't want to.
Please note that we are eager to call these versions publishable, and we welcome comments for later revisions.
Responder | About this survey |
---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry | |
Denis Boudreau | |
Laura Keen | |
Sharron Rush | |
Kris Anne Kinney | |
Vicki Menezes Miller | |
Eric Eggert | Unfortunately, I’m unable to commit the time to review the documents. I did skim over some of the changes and was OK with them. |
Chris O'Brien | |
Sylvie Duchateau | |
Matthew Putland | |
Robert Jolly | |
Brent Bakken | |
Amanda Mace | |
Howard Kramer | |
Norah Sinclair |
summary | by responder | by choice
"Essential Components of Web Accessibility" has been updated, as detailed below. Please review the changes to confirm your satisfaction with the changes, and to approve its publication.
There are a few minor changes:
GitHub issues have been addressed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I approve publication. | 9 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | 4 |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | 1 |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Essential Components of Web Accessibility - Changes Approval | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Laura Keen |
|
In the summary: Should "develop" be "developed" |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Could the link "described below" maybe be extended to include the abbreviations of the guidelines to make the link more meaningful, i.e., instead of "described below" modify to "WCAG, ATAG, and UAAG, described below". |
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Chris O'Brien |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Matthew Putland |
|
|
Robert Jolly |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
I would add "also" to "It [also] provides the foundation ..." To me it reads strangely without it. |
Norah Sinclair |
|
1. typo: missing develop missing "ed" ...It provides the foundation for understanding the different accessibility standards develop by the W3C Web |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I approve publication. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. |
|
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. |
|
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
summary | by responder | by choice
"How to Make Your Presentations Accessible to All" has been updated, as detailed below. Please review the changes to confirm your satisfaction with the changes, and to approve its publication.
There is 1 substantive change:
from: "Electronic formats such as HTML (that is, web page format) and RTF are often the most flexible to meet different people's needs."
to: "Word processing formats are often the most flexible to meet different people’s needs."
Here it is in context: Provide Accessible Material and Media section.
All other changes are non-substantive copyedits.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I approve publication. | 14 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Make Presentations Accessible to All - Changes Approval | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Laura Keen |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Chris O'Brien |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Matthew Putland |
|
|
Robert Jolly |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I approve publication. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
summary | by responder | by choice
"Involving Users in Web Projects for Better, Easier Accessibility" has been updated.
There are no substantive changes. All changes are non-substantive copy edits.
(Note: "{.termref}" in the Word Diff is markdown that is not displayed in the rendered page.)
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I approve publication. | 11 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | 2 |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | 1 |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Involving Users in Web Projects - Changes Approval | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Laura Keen |
|
adaptive strategies{#strategies} and assistive technologies{.termref}. spacing issues before the opening bracket ? |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Several times, there is {.termref} is mentioned. Is it an error? |
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Chris O'Brien |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Matthew Putland |
|
|
Robert Jolly |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
I noticed that there is a "Caution" sentence highlighted in yellow. Are we applying that to the finished page or is that just part of the preview in GitHub? |
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I approve publication. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. |
|
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. |
|
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
summary | by responder | by choice
"Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility" has been updated.
There are no substantive changes. All changes are non-substantive copy edits.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I approve publication. | 14 |
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. | 1 |
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Involving Users in Evaluating - Changes Approval | Comments |
---|---|---|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Denis Boudreau |
|
|
Laura Keen |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Chris O'Brien |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Matthew Putland |
|
|
Robert Jolly |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
Same highlighting of the Caution statement. Same question as Q4 comment box. |
Amanda Mace |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I approve publication. |
|
I'm OK with publication as is; please consider my [ED] comments in GitHub (or below) for Editors' discretion now or later. | |
I will approve publication only after my [!!] comments in GitHub (or below) are addressed. | |
I need more time, and will complete the review by the date in the Comments field below. | |
I abstain and accept the decision of the group. |
|
fyi, I added some [later] comments in GitHub to consider for later iterations. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.