w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-09-07 to 2018-09-13.
12 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2018 Minutes wiki page.
If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. | 8 |
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 3 |
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference | Comments |
---|---|---|
Laura Keen |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Lewis Phillips |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Stéphane Deschamps |
|
[will not read them, sorry, for lack of availability this week] |
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Andrew Arch |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. |
|
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
|
A complete preview of the tutorials with all changes is available.
The tutorials were updated to reflect editorial changes for WCAG 2.1. This mainly means changing references from “WCAG 2.0” to “WCAG 2” in the template and content. The following example shows a diff of the extent of the changes on most pages:
Here are some pages with changes that go beyond the template as diffs:
Planned publication of the change is Friday September 14th, 2018. If you have any feedback on the changes above, open a GitHub issue or leave a comment below.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results |
Responder | Editorial Update of Tutorials for WCAG 2.1 | |
---|---|---|
Laura Keen | ||
Sylvie Duchateau | ||
Sharron Rush | Yep, looks good, thank you. | |
Lewis Phillips | ||
Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
Stéphane Deschamps | (no comment) | |
Kris Anne Kinney | Put my edit into Github | |
Vicki Menezes Miller | ||
Brent Bakken | Excellent Work Eric! | |
Norah Sinclair | ||
Howard Kramer | ||
Andrew Arch | Presume we'll add 2.1 specific criteria with a later pass? eg 1.4.11 with the Forms and Images tutorials |
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read and review the current draft of the Business Case for Accessibility. Please review from the perspective that this is now a Complete Draft (#3 on the list of stages).
Thank you.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine. | 3 |
I have reviewed and entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below. | 1 |
I have reviewed and entered a comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below. | 3 |
I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new. | 3 |
I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below. | 2 |
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group. |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | The Business Case for Accessibility - Complete Draft | Comments |
---|---|---|
Laura Keen |
|
|
Sylvie Duchateau |
|
Thursday 14 September |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
Lewis Phillips |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry | ||
Stéphane Deschamps |
|
Small conjugation typo: “Such innovations lead to the wealth of personal digital assistants in many homes and offices.” should be “Such innovations led to the wealth of personal digital assistants in many homes and offices.” (preterit) Also: “Change is occured incrementally and steadily.” I don't know if “occur” can be used in the passive form, I leave it to you English-speaking natives. ;) “Case Study: Juan Carlos Gil vs. Winn-Dixie retailer”: the year it happened would be a useful information, I think. Last typo: s/enagage/engage/ For the rest, very good paper, great job! |
Kris Anne Kinney |
|
I am doing a copy edit review and will be done ASAP. |
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
Norah Sinclair |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Andrew Arch |
|
Inconsistency with placement of super-script end-note links - sometimes there a space after the word before the number & sometimes not |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine. |
|
I have reviewed and entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below. |
|
I have reviewed and entered a comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below. |
|
I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new. |
|
I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below. |
|
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group. |
Have you updated your EOWG Teleconference Availability lately? (If not, please do so now. Thank you!)
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
yes | 11 |
no |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Responder | EOWG Teleconference Availability |
---|---|
Laura Keen | yes |
Sylvie Duchateau | yes |
Sharron Rush | |
Lewis Phillips | yes |
Shawn Lawton Henry | yes |
Stéphane Deschamps | yes |
Kris Anne Kinney | yes |
Vicki Menezes Miller | yes |
Brent Bakken | yes |
Norah Sinclair | yes |
Howard Kramer | yes |
Andrew Arch | yes |
Feel free to put here things such as:
(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)
Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)
Responder | Other Information to Share |
---|---|
Laura Keen | |
Sylvie Duchateau | |
Sharron Rush | |
Lewis Phillips | |
Shawn Lawton Henry | |
Stéphane Deschamps | |
Kris Anne Kinney | |
Vicki Menezes Miller | Business Case Undoc |
Brent Bakken | Understand Document Review and Revision |
Norah Sinclair | Understanding Docs |
Howard Kramer | |
Andrew Arch |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.