This workshop was originally scheduled to be held in the first four months of the project. It was held over until October 2002 (month 6) in order that it be hosted in conjunction with the Dublin Core 2002 conference, which brought together an international audience with related interests and expertise.
This workshop was divided into two parts. the first was a short general introduction to the project, its goals and methodology.
The second part consisted of a specific technical developers workshop, focusing on the issues of combining free text searching and metadata-based discovery. The major outcome was gathering, and where possible answering, frequently asked questions about best practices for using RDF.
The workshops were open to all, through attending the Dublin Core 2002 Conference.
This report is part of the SWAD-Europe project Work package 3: Dissemination and Implementation. It serves as the report on the Initial Workshop deliverable.
The areas investigated in this workshop are "pre-standardization". In other words, although there is some sentiment for using existing standards and for more standards in the relevant areas, there is not yet standardization of the schemes and vocabularies used. Each topic builds on existing standards, most particularly RDF.
Some of the time that had been allocated to the workshop was in fact used for Dublin Core technical work.
The project, as a major European Initiative, needed to be explained in a presentation style, as well as the material available which currently focuses on the administrative detail or work to be completed and is designed primarily for the participants and the Commission as a reference. In addition to a physical presentation this would provide an archived slide presentation of the project itself.
There have been a number of searching methods provided for the Web - from manually creating links of content, or automatically providing systems to ease the process, through plain text searching. Dublin Core metadata was designed to assist in searching and finding resources, particularly via the Web.
There have been different approaches to encoding information for enhancing searches, and one of the goals of the technical phase of the workshop was to draw some conclusions about which of these approaches represents best practices. It is assumed that best practices might include techniques drawn from the use of RDF, from plain text searching technology, from the experience of Dublin Core users, and perhaps other sources.
The workshop was held over two days, in two parts, as a series of sessions at the DC2002 Conference.
The first was a general introduction to the goals, methodology and work plan of the project. This workshop sought to foster awareness of the SWAD-Europe project internationally, and will seek feedback from an experienced international development community on the general directions and work areas of the project.
An Introduction to SWAD-E
Chairs: Dan Brickley, Libby Miller, Charles McCathieNevile
This session will present the main work areas of the project and the partners directly involved, with discussion of the overall goals, methods of work, tools available and needed, and strategies for development and deployment.
The second was a developers workshop to discuss the issues arising from combining free-text searching methods with metadata-based discovery in order to provide more focussed information.
Data interoperability - tools, techniques and use cases
Chairs: Dan Brickley, Dave Beckett, Eric Miller
This session will investigate the issues of interoperability between data based on Dublin Core, but extended using various different schemas. Using a set of data made available that includes Dublin Core with different extensions it will look at the combination of four strategies
- Using hierarchical classification schemes, for example qualified Dublin Core, or the RDF Schema property
subProperty
.- Full text indexing of element content (such as RDF literals) including searching for phrases and substrings in plain text.
- Tracking provenance of statements - who said that resource X is of type Y
- Enhanced aggregation - using metadata to support more powerful queries and give more accurate results.
An important question is how to enhance people's ability to find resources on the Web without requiring them to become experts in Dublin Core and RDF.
As the SWAD-Europe workshop was hosted within the Dublin Core conference, a number of joint sessions were held to tak advantage of the opportunity. Rather than holding parallel sessions the organisers agreed to merge two parallel sessions - one discussing Dublin Core Architecture and the other Schema Registries.
The introductory session provided an important group of information managers with an introduction to the goals of the SWAD-Europe project. It provided the opportunity to develop relationships between the project and metadata-related activity (most particularly in the field of library management) in Europe, and the opportunity to explore possibilities for furthering the outreach goals of the project.
The time used for working on issues specific to Dublin Core was used for discussion of best practice in encoding Dublin Core in RDF, within the Dublin Core Architecture group. A one hour session discussed strategy and priorities for the ongoing work of the Dubiln Core Architecture Working Group, and how that work relates to the Semantic Web Initiative. A second session on RDF schema registries allowed the SWAD workshop attendees and Dublin Core Registry Group members to join in shared discussion of tools and techniques for managing RDF schema registries.
The time spent on technical issues led to a rough set of notes from the discussion which include some Frequently Asked Questions, and some proposed answers. There were also several sets of slides presented, and some tools (see the next section for more details).
Several sets of slides were presented during the workshops. In addition, several tools were presented during the technical workshop
The following were questions raised in the Technical sessions with answers suggested:
link
element in HTML) or include the data directly (e.g. with the
metadata
element in SVG). In other cases the person
creating the metadata does not have control over the original
resource, but can associate it via third-party query services (e.g.
Annotea)Some questions raised are addressed by work done elsewhere, in some cases within the SWAD-E project:
is designed to provide the reader with the basic knowledge required to effectively use RDF. It introduces the basic concepts of RDF and describes its XML syntax. It describes how to define RDF vocabularies using the RDF Vocabulary Description Language, and gives an overview of some deployed RDF applications. It also describes the content and purpose of other RDF specification documents.
The following questions were also raised, but with no answers recorded from the discussion. Through the life of the project it is planned to gather answers to these questions, and this report wil be updated accordingly.