ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed?
Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed?
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- Patent Policy
- Raised by:
- Jeff Jaffe
- Opened on:
- 2013-07-08
- Description:
- This is a Patent Policy issue (not Technical Reports)
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- List of Issue in the Revising the W3C Process Tracket that are Not Currently viewed as being In Scope for the Process Document TF (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2013-07-09)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from skpeterson@google.com on 2013-07-08)
- RE: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2013-07-08)
- Re: Scope Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-07-08)
- Scope Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-07-08)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-07-08)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from jeff@w3.org on 2013-07-08)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-07-08)
- w3process-ISSUE-36: Should the waiting period required by the Patent Policy be changed? [Process Document] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-07-08)
Related notes:
[Ralph]: exclusion period was discussed at the 05-May AB face-to-face https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2013JanMar/0058.html
8 Jul 2013, 14:35:11Display change log